MTCoonHunter
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Feb 2012
Location: Montana
Posts: 78 |
Landowners--another thought
I'm wondering what people's take are on this, because the consistent perspectives seem to be: my dog doesn't know property lines so you can't shoot him/or whatever.
Your hound comes on my property, which I could care less about, but my border collie is protective of his home turf. Your hound trees on my property and the border collie says "heck no, I'm going to run you off." Border collie goes in for the fight and naturally your hound must protect himself. My dog is weird, no matter how many times another dog pins him, he will jump back up and go back at it--he will just not submit. So your dog has to really put the hurt on my dog just to protect himself--that's natural and logical.
Now you come onto my property to retrieve your dog like a responsible hunter, but my dog tries to run you off and may even bite you. Naturally you must also protect yourself--how far you might have to go could get ugly, who knows, but it of course necessary and fair for you to defend yourself.
So your dog has crossed on to my property and my dog has attacked you and your dog to protect his home--neither one has done anything wrong, it's natural for dogs. What if my dog is so aggressive you have to shoot him? What if your dog tears my dog up?
Does anyone ever think about that or take scenarios like that in that into consideration when it comes to landowners shooting hounds?
I know people are usually talking about the landowner shooting their dog for no reason, so this scenario isn't meant to be a comparison to those situations at all.
(and be noted, my dog has never bit anyone nor tried)
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|