JiM
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Sep 2010
Location: New Paris, Indiana
Posts: 7076 |
Has anyone ever seen a dog minused for babbling without an argument ensuing? The mere suggestion that a dog was struck babbling will get things all riled up just about every time. That is why no babbling rule that is ever devised will be effectively used by judges in these hunts. Nobody wants to deal with the piss'in match that always comes along with the call. I mean we do this for fun and not many of us enjoy fighting and arguing so who is gonna make a call that basically guarantees an arguement and a fight?
I think the only way to effectively deal with babbling is to make it something that is worthless as opposed to making it a valuable fault which is what it is today. You do that by making strike points neutral. Every strike position is worth the same amount, say 50 points. You have to assign some level of strike points so that you have a means to penalize the other faults such as quitting and coming in, covering late, not being struck on or before the 3rd bark, etc. So strike them all for, say, 50 and the dog that trees the coons will be your winner. The best track dog will get the most first trees, the most first trees will win. Isn't this what we are after anyway?
The only alternative I can see is to quite griping about the loosemouth dogs and just get one yourself.
__________________
UKC Nite Champion Stylish Harry's Trixie - 2017 World Hunt Qualified - Owners - Sizemore/Martin
PKC CH/UKC GrNtCh Stylish Kate - 9/12/08 to 9/23/2016 R.I.P - Owners Sizemore/Martin
AKC/UKC NtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jeff 5/2/2000 to 1/22/2012 R.I.P.
AKC/UKC GrNtCh Sizemore's Timber Jam Jessi 12/21/04 to 1/21/2011 R.I.P.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|