Oak Ridge
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6168 |
North VS. South????
Okay guys, I'm NOT wanting to start a flame war here....actually just the opposite, I want to understand the whole "thin coon" point of view.
I've read a whole lot of posts lately debating the whole "thin coon vs thick coon" point of view and as hard as I try....I just don't get it. Now I realize that there is going to be an ongoing debate because we all have opinions. I'm not trying to dismiss anyone's beliefs, but how can you say that a dog that spends two hours beating around on the only coon track in thousands of acres is a "better" dog.
Hey, I'll be the first one to admit that I want a good, BALANCED, dog. That means one that can go hunting, find a coon (be it 50 yards, or two miles), trail, tree, stay treed...blah, blah, blah. And I normally have one that is as close to that as I can.....BUT
Having hunted several times in "thin" coon, I just can't get past the luck factor that is far more prevalent in thin coon populations I mean if you turn 4 dogs loose and they each go to different point on the compass, and they all hunt out well, and at the end of a two hour hunt only one of them has actually struck a track managed to trail it up and tree.....someone please tell me how that is the "better" dog.
Coon hounds are the only dogs that I've ever seen have this argument. I've never heard of a beagle hunt where they pride themselves in having a low rabbit population, I've never seen a bird dog field trial participant slap each other on the back because there was only one bird to be pointed, or a squirrel dog hunt participant proud because they treed the only squirrel in four square miles....
I once drove 14 hours south, hunted for two nights and hunted hard.....ended up getting in a cast and we turned loose in thousands of acres of three year old pine trees. The guide freely admitted that there were no coon anywhere close. The three local dogs in the cast consisted of a dog that made a bucket sweep, and never got out of our lights....got scratched for not hunting. The other two got struck on a diller, ran it for about 50 yards or so and shut up....the two participants owning those dogs stated that the dogs "trailed over the hill" and would not put the track time on them....we finally found them treed, about 4 miles from where we turned them loose along a river. Both dogs were treed on small trees that had some leaves on them, and despite the fact that they were slick...got circled. I found my dog three miles the other direction, still in pine trees and never even drew a bark......
Now, how were those dogs any "better" than the one I brought....???
Again, I'm not trying to start a flame war, I am seeking a better understanding for myself.
__________________
Joe Newlin
UKC Cur Advocate
Home of Oak Ridge Kennels
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|