Buckshot
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: ALABAMA
Posts: 5183 |
Inspectors
This is a key element to the program, as the future success of any program hinges on its integrity. Every effort has been made to prevent the buddy system from playing a part, while at the same time not making this so restrictive that it would not be feasible for clubs to do. Inspectors need not be licensed to evaluate dogs in a hunt test. They must be able to sign the evaluation form in agreement to three key elements. First, they may not have bred, trained, or housed the dog they are evaluating, and may not be a regular hunting partner of the owner or handler of the dog they are evaluating. They must be able to agree to the statement that they have been an active coon hunting participant for at least five years, and able to identify the criteria for evaluating working coonhounds. And finally, they must sign a release that the evaluation is true and accurate to the best of their ability, and that they acknowledge the fact that any misrepresentation on the part of the inspector is punishable by UKC sanctions.
Though the role of the inspector is much the same as a non-hunting judge in the nite hunts, it is not believed that clubs will have nearly as much problem lining up inspectors as non-hunting judges. Because the event is not based on heads-up competition between four handlers, the job of evaluating coonhounds under this format is much easier than the role of a non-hunting judge on a nite hunt cast. The whole program was designed to closely simulate a one-dog pleasure hunt with two or three hunting buddies. The evaluation process is neither complicated nor confrontational, which should make lining up inspectors a fairly easy process.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|