J I Allen
UKC Forum Member
Registered: May 2012
Location: Asheville, North Carolina
Posts: 629 |
I guess I don't explain myself very well. With all the different KC formats to hunt under why make all the different KC rules the same or so close that it doesn't make any difference what KC you hunt in. I think we need different formats. I think people started breeding dogs for a certain KC's format and maybe they don't do as well in a different format, so they want all the different KC's rules to be about the same or exactly the same. change simply for the sake of change isn't always a good thing. I remember when they started changing rules because some kid got a ninth place when he finished second on his cast, people complained that we were getting cheap champions, when that kid still had to get a first place win to make NT. CH. The kid was hunting against 8 or 10 other 4 dogs cast, now a club will have only one cast with 2 or 3 dogs, so tell me how that rule change made better NT. Ch's. They quit coming to the hunts because if they didn't win a cast they didn't get anything to show for the effort. I know of one hunt that had 2 dogs show up, one NT. CH., and one registered and the same man owned both dogs, so from the 90's when everyone started wanting new rules until now, how that has helped attendance and made the Nt. Ch. better.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|