Dave Richards
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Apr 2015
Location: church hill tn
Posts: 5459 |
Rick St Clair
I respect your opinion and agree with your consensus that we are changing the RULES to fit today's dogs. My point exactly regarding the separate strike rule, as we have the separate tree rule. Today's dogs are not together on 1 coon, they are split most of the time. Why would anyone think that 1 dog should benefit more by striking their coon faster if the dogs were on separate tracks and tree separate coons. What logic says this is fair at any time? No one argues that separate trees get scored as separate and dogs gets 125 for separate tree, but does not get a separate strike. SMH. I am 74 and remember when all dogs were together both strike and tree, but we all KNOW that this does not happen with today's dogs ( right or wrong ) it's just the way it is today. It does not take much sense to award the points the dog/s deserve both strike and tree. Why is this so hard for folks to understand? Strike points should not be treated any different than tree points to award the dogs what they deserve. While I do not hunt in the hunts any more, I follow all the major hunts both UKC and PKC and I know for sure that there are many dogs winning casts on the first strike aspect, even though the other dogs tread separate coons. Tell me how this is fair? Dave
P.S. For those saying we are changing the RULES to fit today's dogs, exactly as the original RULES were set to fit the dogs competing in those days.
__________________
Dave Richards Treeing Walkers Reg American Saddlebred and Registered Rocky Mt. Show Horses
Last edited by Dave Richards on 02-21-2023 at 01:55 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|