Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9186

10. Declaring Dog Treed After Tree is Closed.


• Call may be accepted but noted. If dog is on a closed tree when judge arrives; assign next available tree points and minus both strike and tree points regardless of how tree is scored.



2019 UKC RULE PROPOSAL CLARIFICATIONS AND NOTES
Be advised, the following notes are the opinions/statements of those who submitted the proposals and may or may not necessarily reflect the opinion of UKC.

PROPOSAL 10: The current rule automatically assigns the handlers dog to a split tree regardless of anything. And if the dog ends up being on a closed tree, there’s a whole lot of minus to be had for the dog. If Proposal 7 passes, the potential for even more minus is even greater. Something to think about.

Last edited by Allen / UKC on 06-11-2019 at 01:24 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Marietta
Posts: 10790

Something to think about what if the handler knows his dog is on a closed tree but does not tree him.


Tar

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9186

quote:

---

Originally posted by yadkintar
Something to think about what if the handler knows his dog is on a closed tree but does not tree him.


Tar

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Marietta
Posts: 10790

I am reading your rule what happens if he don’t tree him you going to leave both rules in.


Quote : call may be accepted !!!



Tar

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9186

quote:

---

Originally posted by yadkintar
I am reading your rule what happens if he don’t tree him you going to leave both rules in.


Quote : call may be accepted !!!



Tar

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Marietta
Posts: 10790

We talked about this before rule 4j and 4K contradict each other.



Tar

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9186

quote:

---

Originally posted by yadkintar
We talked about this before rule 4j and 4K contradict each other.



Tar

---

I'm confused as I don't see how they contradict each other. We might need to discuss this one on the phone so as not to steer the topic of this thread off to la-la-land.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2013
Location: Marietta
Posts: 10790

Ok

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1738

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Allen / UKC
[B]10. Declaring Dog Treed After Tree is Closed.


• Call may be accepted but noted. If dog is on a closed tree when judge arrives; assign next available tree points and minus both strike and tree points regardless of how tree is scored.


IMO ...this is a ridiculous proposal... The only time this dog should get minused is if the tree is plussed.... This type of proposal only perpetuates the wood monster/leaf hounds.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Dec 2017
Location:
Posts: 340

quote:

---

Originally posted by Dogwhisper
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Allen / UKC
[B]10. Declaring Dog Treed After Tree is Closed.


• Call may be accepted but noted. If dog is on a closed tree when judge arrives; assign next available tree points and minus both strike and tree points regardless of how tree is scored.


IMO ...this is a ridiculous proposal... The only time this dog should get minused is if the tree is plussed.... This type of proposal only perpetuates the wood monster/leaf hounds.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: May 2004
Location: Sullivan IL.
Posts: 3060

It should stay the way it is! Minus the dog for not being split treed

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged