honalieh
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 2154 |
Re: Honalieh
quote: Originally posted by Dave Richards
You are talking like the dig to tree first is the true coon dog, and the rest are to slow to keep up. That's nonsense, you are right about they all can't be first strike or first tree, I certainly don't advocate that. I merely pointed out the inequity of dogs getting separate tree POINTS, but not separate strike POINTS. How is this a tryout test, a competition should be as true a test as possible. You somehow want to imply that a dog striking and treeing independently is somehow less dog. If there weren't different coons to run and tree, they would not be doing so. Slick tree get minused, tracks they don't finish get minused. A dog only get plus POINTS for doing it right, striking and treeing a coon that is seen. If separate POINTS for separate coons is given to both strike and tree, it would be fair to everyone. Dave
I did not suggest that the dog to tree 1st is the true coon dog, just that it was the dog to tree 1st. Quite often the dogs that tree 1st, tree quick and tree slick. I remember judging a dog (I was non-hunting judge---back when it was required) that placed 6th in the ACHA World Hunt (83 I believe). She minused out in less than 1/2 an hour (2 1st strikes, 2 1st trees, 2 slick saplings). Later, went with a buddy that drew her. I advised him not to try to keep up with her on strike and tree points. You can't beat her, you have to let her beat herself. That's exactly what happened.
I do believe that a dog that can get struck, get treed, and HAVE THE MEAT before anything else does deserves more points than anything else does.
My personal experience is that the dogs I've had and hunted with that would split excessively (independent to a fault, would not honor another dog) is that they ARE NOT AS GOOD as the dog they are splitting from. That's based on the fact that the dog treeing 1st HAD THE COON. If you compared them to a slick 1st tree dog, that's an entirely different story. Example: One dog could hang on a tap or slick, and the other trees the coon. In that case, I want the one that trees the coon.
As far as the inequity of separate tree points, but not separate strike points, I agree. I would not give separate tree points either. The dog that strikes 1st (deer/fox), blows through the country, and switches over and falls treed with a coon gets 225. The honest coon dog treeing coon behind him gets less. I'd rather have the dog treeing coon behind the old trashy switchover dog. But, under the every dog can be a 1st tree dog rules, the old trashy switchover dog could WIPEOUT (points wise) the dogs striking and treeing coon behind him. The one may be better for competition, but it's not much good for coonhunting.
To me, treeing a COON 1st is better than treeing a coon 2nd, 3rd, or 4th. The same applies to strike, with the caveat that we can't always determine or prove what type of track they actually struck.
If it's possible for every dog to get 1st tree (I don't agree with it), and then for each of them to also get 1st strike (I don't agree with it), then why should they be turned loose together???
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|