UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Originally posted by shadinc
If both lists were done by percentages wouldn't there be only one list?
No when dogs haven't produced any pups for 1 year they fall off the current producers list. I believe the historical last for 25 years but could be wrong, regardless they can be on it for a long time.
In the Walker historical there is only one dog with less than 1,000 pups on the ground. Even the current list there are several with higher percentages than some of the historical. I'm sure other breeds also reflect this. I know of an English dog (now dead) that is around 30% also and though he has over the 100 required pups will never make the historical list even though his percentage is nearly double that of the highest on the historical.
Just because some didn't try to breed the &@//$ off their dogs or were more selective in breeding doesn't mean they haven't had a positive effect on the breed and don't deserve recognition.
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
NAT GRNITECH GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION. 2019 AUTUMN OAKS NATIONAL GRAND NITE CHAMPION.
GRNITECH CH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged