nextcoonhunters
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jul 2015
Location: mo
Posts: 749 |
cleared the air
Will after a long talk we kind of cleared the air. Yeah a first it was a meetup and beat up talk. But the difference in thoughts. Is Mike right? Yes according to UKC Mike is right, on the fact that the owner of the female is the breeder. My thought might be wrong but it'll take God himself to change it. Takes 2 to tango. In people, if both parts aren't in agreement they call it rape. I think if someone wasn't willing to own the female themselves even if money is on the line they shouldn't breed it. Should the owner of the female be able to breed to whatever stud they want, without consent from the owner of the stud? Again not the correct opinion maybe, but the way I look at it takes 2 to tango. I guess instead of stud owners, we are pimps, that don't check out the johns as long as the money is good. We talk about people who breed to sell pups, and only to make money. Isn't studin a male and not filtering what it is being bred to him the same thing? There is alot of people breeding dogs for money, instead of to make coondogs. A question I would always ask anyone selling puppies is why do you think this cross will work. If they don't have a long list of reasons, I would back away. If they do I would listen to em and then do my own research, before considering across. Yes, titled dogs, for the most part, earn their titles, but it's not hard to check them out. Ask around. Pr dogs, go hunting with em multiple times check them out. Research is part but then get your pup and train it. Whether you want a good untitled coondog or a world champ, neither can be made without strapping on your boots and hitting the timber hard. And I hope that is a point we can all agree on.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|