UKC Forums UKC Front Page :: Field Operations :: Show Operations :: Registration :: UKC Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Coonhounds > Reproducer List
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
AAThoundhunter
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jul 2014
Location:
Posts: 54

Reproducer List

Currently percentages are taken from overall number of pups produced. I would think you should only compute percentages based on the number of pups registered. It is not the fault of the sire, dam, or breeder that those pups did not get registered and it could make a difference within the rankings. Also I do not have a dog that would benefit from any of this, it is just something I thought about as I was looking through it. What are your thoughts?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-24-2019 06:46 PM
AAThoundhunter is offline Click Here to See the Profile for AAThoundhunter Click here to Send AAThoundhunter a Private Message Find more posts by AAThoundhunter Add AAThoundhunter to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redneck Mafia
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Posts: 3635

The question I've always had is why the historical list is based off of the dogs with the most Nitech & Grnitech and the current list is off of highest percentages.
Our old dog when we retired him from breeding was the #1 Walker (highest on the list of any breed) on the current list with right at 21% his number now is over 30%. Dogs like him will never be recognized even though their numbers blow the historical list away. I think it would be nice if even once a year the dogs that meet the qualifications (100 for sires and 20 for dams) are recognized for their overall percentages in reproduction. Give credit where it is due. These dogs may not have 3,000 pups on the ground but made an impact within their breed.

*As someone who has several sets of pup papers from decesed dogs and know of many others that have died young I do see your point.
Ukc ? If I were to send these registrations back do they come off the total number of pups?

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION
NITECH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-24-2019 07:11 PM
Redneck Mafia is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redneck Mafia Click here to Send Redneck Mafia a Private Message Click Here to Email Redneck Mafia Find more posts by Redneck Mafia Add Redneck Mafia to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
AAThoundhunter
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jul 2014
Location:
Posts: 54

I agree everything should be based off percentages and if you meet the 100/20 qualification then that dog should be listed on the historical list. Personally for me I will always look at percentages over total number just for that reason not all dogs have 1000+ pups.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-24-2019 11:35 PM
AAThoundhunter is offline Click Here to See the Profile for AAThoundhunter Click here to Send AAThoundhunter a Private Message Find more posts by AAThoundhunter Add AAThoundhunter to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Richard Lambert
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Chattanooga, Tn
Posts: 16598

The Historical Reproducers List is a list of the 10 dogs who have produced the most titled offspring. The Current List is the Top 10 dogs with the highest percentage. Why would you want 2 lists that went by percentage? Is the "Top" dog the one with the most or the one with the highest percentage?

Last edited by Richard Lambert on 04-25-2019 at 01:24 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 01:22 AM
Richard Lambert is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Lambert Click here to Send Richard Lambert a Private Message Click Here to Email Richard Lambert Find more posts by Richard Lambert Add Richard Lambert to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Dave Richards
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Apr 2015
Location: church hill tn
Posts: 2776

Mr. Lambert

My guess us the one with the highest percentages, that tell us more than just numbers tells us. A dog with 3000 pups may have higher numbers but smaller percentages, now which do you think is more relevant? Dave

__________________
Dave Richards Treeing Walkers Reg American Saddlebred and Registered Rocky Mt. Show Horses

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 02:18 AM
Dave Richards is online now Click Here to See the Profile for Dave Richards Click here to Send Dave Richards a Private Message Click Here to Email Dave Richards Find more posts by Dave Richards Add Dave Richards to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redneck Mafia
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Posts: 3635

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
The Historical Reproducers List is a list of the 10 dogs who have produced the most titled offspring. The Current List is the Top 10 dogs with the highest percentage. Why would you want 2 lists that went by percentage? Is the "Top" dog the one with the most or the one with the highest percentage?

Why would you want the top reproducers today's and historical to be based on different criteria? Never made much since to me.
And I personally along with MANY others would like to see historical by percentages not the dogs that happen to have the most pups. Even if it is a once a year list of the all time best percentage reproducers let's see them. Of course I also think this should be a true all time list not limited by time. Give those dogs that are deserving a little recognition.

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION
NITECH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 02:43 AM
Redneck Mafia is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redneck Mafia Click here to Send Redneck Mafia a Private Message Click Here to Email Redneck Mafia Find more posts by Redneck Mafia Add Redneck Mafia to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Richard Lambert
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Chattanooga, Tn
Posts: 16598

So which dog is the Top Reproducer (not the best). The dog that produces 2,000 pups and 100 are titled or the dog that produces 100 pups and 10 are titled. I guess that they should have a Best Reproducer List.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 04:57 AM
Richard Lambert is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Lambert Click here to Send Richard Lambert a Private Message Click Here to Email Richard Lambert Find more posts by Richard Lambert Add Richard Lambert to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
shadinc
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1955

If both lists were done by percentages wouldn't there be only one list?

__________________
Donald Bergeron

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 05:07 AM
shadinc is offline Click Here to See the Profile for shadinc Click here to Send shadinc a Private Message Click Here to Email shadinc Find more posts by shadinc Add shadinc to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Travis Brown
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Jackson, MO
Posts: 696

The problem I see with just doing percentages is you get dogs with a low number of pups that didn't cross well on several females. They just had one good cross made 5 times. They had a niche cross but weren't good reproducers if they couldn't produce off several females.

__________________
Travis Brown
tlanebrown@hotmail.com
573-579-3853C
573-204-3397H
Home of :
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Peggy 4/91-1/02
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Little Peg 6/98-3/08
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Haley 8/02-11/13
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Taylor 3/05-11/17
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Rotten 10/08-2/13
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Midge 12/10-
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Jessie 4/14-

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 05:42 AM
Travis Brown is online now Click Here to See the Profile for Travis Brown Click here to Send Travis Brown a Private Message Click Here to Email Travis Brown Find more posts by Travis Brown Add Travis Brown to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redneck Mafia
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Posts: 3635

quote:
Originally posted by shadinc
If both lists were done by percentages wouldn't there be only one list?

No when dogs haven't produced any pups for 1 year they fall off the current producers list. I believe the historical last for 25 years but could be wrong, regardless they can be on it for a long time.
In the Walker historical there is only one dog with less than 1,000 pups on the ground. Even the current list there are several with higher percentages than some of the historical. I'm sure other breeds also reflect this. I know of an English dog (now dead) that is around 30% also and though he has over the 100 required pups will never make the historical list even though his percentage is nearly double that of the highest on the historical.
Just because some didn't try to breed the &@//$ off their dogs or were more selective in breeding doesn't mean they haven't had a positive effect on the breed and don't deserve recognition.

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION
NITECH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 05:45 AM
Redneck Mafia is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redneck Mafia Click here to Send Redneck Mafia a Private Message Click Here to Email Redneck Mafia Find more posts by Redneck Mafia Add Redneck Mafia to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Kenneth Tavares
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: 1322 Ginger Trl Manning, S.C. 29102
Posts: 2880

My dog only has 2 pups and both are titled, itís at 100% and should be leading the list! 😳😂

__________________
🇺🇸TAVARES' FIRST CLASS BLACK & TANS...🇺🇸
HOME OF THE FUTURE...POWERED BY:
GRNTCH GRCH FIRST CLASS SMOKIN' JETS-"SON"
1/24/02---5/21/12
Manning, South Carolina
Ph. 803-840-2013

💰💰Click blue link to check us out on Facebook💰💰
👉🏼 Tavares' First Class Black & Tans 👈🏼


Tone it down guys, or they will delete another good topic...

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 04:51 PM
Kenneth Tavares is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Kenneth Tavares Click here to Send Kenneth Tavares a Private Message Click Here to Email Kenneth Tavares Find more posts by Kenneth Tavares Add Kenneth Tavares to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redneck Mafia
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Posts: 3635

quote:
Originally posted by Travis Brown
The problem I see with just doing percentages is you get dogs with a low number of pups that didn't cross well on several females. They just had one good cross made 5 times. They had a niche cross but weren't good reproducers if they couldn't produce off several females.

Which is why they should stick to the 100 for sires and 20 dams.

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION
NITECH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 08:27 PM
Redneck Mafia is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redneck Mafia Click here to Send Redneck Mafia a Private Message Click Here to Email Redneck Mafia Find more posts by Redneck Mafia Add Redneck Mafia to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Richard Lambert
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Chattanooga, Tn
Posts: 16598

Maybe the Current List goes by percentages because female owners use it as a tool to help pick a stud and pup buyers use it to see where to go for a pup with the best chance of becoming a coon dog. But the historical list is just to recognize the dogs that have produced the most titled offspring.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 09:06 PM
Richard Lambert is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Lambert Click here to Send Richard Lambert a Private Message Click Here to Email Richard Lambert Find more posts by Richard Lambert Add Richard Lambert to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Blaze P.
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2019
Location: Broughton, Illinois
Posts: 51

I had a dog in the top 5 for 4 years straight, didn't have big numbers. No way did she compare to some of the bigger names in reproduction ability, even though she had a higher percentage. Far as I'm concerned that list is just to make you feel good if you make it, but not a solid tool to go by.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-25-2019 10:02 PM
Blaze P. is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Blaze P. Click here to Send Blaze P. a Private Message Find more posts by Blaze P. Add Blaze P. to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Travis Brown
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Jackson, MO
Posts: 696

I think the historical should be the ones with the most hunt titled dogs. Yes, they have more pups but there had to be a reason more people were breeding to them. The ones with the most titled offspring are most likely to have the greatest impact on the breed. I think that is the dogs that belong in the historical list.


I do like to know of sires that are producing high percentages of winners so long as they aren't about all from the same cross. I'm just not sure it should replace what is already there. Maybe another category.

__________________
Travis Brown
tlanebrown@hotmail.com
573-579-3853C
573-204-3397H
Home of :
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Peggy 4/91-1/02
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Little Peg 6/98-3/08
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Haley 8/02-11/13
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Taylor 3/05-11/17
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Rotten 10/08-2/13
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Midge 12/10-
Gr. Nt. Ch. Browns Jessie 4/14-

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-26-2019 04:33 AM
Travis Brown is online now Click Here to See the Profile for Travis Brown Click here to Send Travis Brown a Private Message Click Here to Email Travis Brown Find more posts by Travis Brown Add Travis Brown to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redneck Mafia
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Posts: 3635

I have suggested a once a year list of the overall highest percentages from dogs both sires and dams that meet the criteria of 100 for sires and 20 for dams not limited by time. We know that there are sires that have 30 + % and I suspect that their are some who may even be much higher.

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION
NITECH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-26-2019 04:58 PM
Redneck Mafia is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redneck Mafia Click here to Send Redneck Mafia a Private Message Click Here to Email Redneck Mafia Find more posts by Redneck Mafia Add Redneck Mafia to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Richard Lambert
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Chattanooga, Tn
Posts: 16598

Jen they will research and send you a list using whatever parameters you request and then you can post it on here. A Redbone guy did that a few years back.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-26-2019 06:45 PM
Richard Lambert is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Richard Lambert Click here to Send Richard Lambert a Private Message Click Here to Email Richard Lambert Find more posts by Richard Lambert Add Richard Lambert to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Redneck Mafia
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2013
Location: Seneca, Mo
Posts: 3635

quote:
Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Jen they will research and send you a list using whatever parameters you request and then you can post it on here. A Redbone guy did that a few years back.

I would think they could post it here and in Coonhound Bloodlines without my request.

__________________
Cheyenne & Jennifer Cummings
Seneca , MO
(417)317-4815
GRNITECH PKC SCH REDNECK MAFIA
GRCH GRNITECH PKC GCH REDNECK BACKWOODS SHACK
2014 OK STATE CH, 2015 MO PKC LEADER, 2016 PKC NATIONALS SEMI-FINALIST. 2016 UKC TOP 20. 2O17 UKC WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP 3RD PLACE. 2018 PKC SENIOR SHOWDOWN TRUCK HUNT FINAL 4. 2018 MO PKC STATE CHAMPION
NITECH PKC CH REDNECK SHACK ATTACK aka TAC 2018 OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMPION

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 04-26-2019 08:38 PM
Redneck Mafia is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Redneck Mafia Click here to Send Redneck Mafia a Private Message Click Here to Email Redneck Mafia Find more posts by Redneck Mafia Add Redneck Mafia to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:46 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - The United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2017, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)