Dave Richards
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Apr 2015
Location: church hill tn
Posts: 5631 |
Titles
I find it amusing that some people think a cast win isn't enough, somehow a higher score cast win meant more! How can anyone ever do more than win their cast with plus points, you are not competing with any other dogs but the ones in your cast. You are at the mercy of your guide and the ground you hunt on, a higher score in another cast meant they had better hunting ground, not a better dog. Some people had honey holes where they made ALL their Champions, does anyone really think they were better than any other cast winner. Fishing in a well stocked pond doesn't equate to ones fishing skills when you fish on a lake that everyone fishes. My solid opinion is that the ones who all ways had the honeyhole advantage are the ones that don't like this change. Big dollar hunts are based on CAST WINS and not Scores to equal the playing field, why should UKC hunts be based on Scores? Many hunters quit the hunts solely based on the honeyhole advantage of placing dogs based on Scores, give these changes time to see if numbers go up. Save all the cheap title remarks as they just don't hold water. You still have to win your cast as was always the case with plus points, now you have to win more. Cheap title, I think not, if anything titles should mean more. No longer will the honeyholers get that 1st place and think they really done something special. Dave
__________________
Dave Richards Treeing Walkers Reg American Saddlebred and Registered Rocky Mt. Show Horses
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|