brian gilley
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 82 |
yall are making this harder than it is and looking for loop holes.
dog A minus both ways
dog b minus tree for being treed and not staying treed( regardless of what it is on)
dog c- minus his strike points and minus next available ( for a slick tree, a 2 foot tall broke off snag that isn't hollow, roll of wire, old scrap car, cage etc.) if he is at the end of a track and showing treed when you get there he gets next available. If he was doing what he was supposed to ie treeing on a tree with a coon , he would not be in this situation. He is just as wrong as dog A, so he get next available.
It being a trap, only comes in to play, if there is a coon in it. for obvious reasons...not fair chase and people could plant traps in there spots for quick and guaranteed points. without a coon in it, there is no reason for a dog to be treeing on it ( the dogs need some correcting!!). The coon being in the trap is what gives it the viable reason to delete.
This is just my opinion, of coarse. Like everyone, i have been mistaken before. However, the more thinking you do on it, the less common sense is applied. You can always add buts and ifs to a situation and twist one rule against another. This is a competiton hunt , which going back to the basics is did the dogs strike and tree a coon? If they did not, then take our minus, drive on and laugh back at the club with everyone and tell the story with a smile on our face. Do this and everyone will be glad to draw you at the next hunt and you will have another enjoyable one, even if the dogs don't operate properly. When you score correctly and don't make excuses, your wins have more merit in everyone eyes.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|