berger
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Lockridge Iowa
Posts: 2848 |
Re: Re: Direct from UKC Legal Counsel
quote: Originally posted by John D
But that's kind of a blind, knee jerk reaction, isn't it? Just because people from HSUS breathe, doesn't mean we should stop breathing, does it? If UKC tells us we should breath air, does that mean they sold out to HSUS?? No way. That's ridiculous but that's exactly the logic of a lot of posters on this subject.
As far as whether this law has any new effect on coonhunting, an actual lawyer posted this:
quote:
Originally posted by S Chisnell
So you can see that hunters are already currently exempted and that will not change with the proposed bill, as I have previously stated. Ths exemption for hunters has existed for 20+ years and has worked to protect hunters all that time--nothing changes that now. .
John D that 20+ yrs. is not entirely true. 20yrs. ago you could have had a treeing contest with a live coon in public and you would have never been charged, today you would have your hounds confiscated, charged with animal cruelty and imprisoned and fined. I have noticed before that you have implied that free casting of coonhounds will probably be a thing of the past 10 yrs. from now or be in enclosed pens. Bills worded like this will in fact speed that up then that will also be able to be conceded as cruelty.
quote: Originally posted by S Chisnell
The EXISTING CURRENT LAW in Kentucky already states:
525.125 Cruelty to animals in the first degree.
(1) The following persons are guilty of cruelty to animals in the first degree
whenever a four-legged animal is caused to fight for pleasure or profit:
(a) The owner of the animal;
(b) The owner of the property on which the fight is conducted if the owner
knows of the fight;
(c) Anyone who participates in the organization of the fight.
(2) Activities of animals engaged in hunting, field trials, dog training, and other
activities authorized either by a hunting license or by the Department of Fish
and Wildlife shall not constitute a violation of this section.
(3) Cruelty to animals in the first degree is a Class D felony.
The proposed bill would add the following wording to expand the class of animal fighters who can be charged:
"
Any person who knowingly owns, possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, sells, or otherwise transfers a four-legged animal for the purpose of that animal or its offspring being used to fight for pleasure or profit is guilty of cruelty to animals in the first degree."
I will add one word to this proposed bill that would protect hunters, houndsmen, outdoorsmen, and farmers. I will capitalize the word I insert.
Any person who knowingly owns, possesses, keeps, breeds, trains, sells, or otherwise transfers a four-legged animal for the SOLE purpose of that animal or its offspring being used to fight for pleasure or profit is guilty of cruelty to animals in the first degree."
__________________
Tree Jar'n Black and Tans
Home of Tree Jar'n Coonhound Kennels
319-201-8445
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|