Rip
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927 |
quote: Originally posted by truly
I AGREE,
or maybe if his bite wasn't as big as his bark he shouldn't have gotten involved at all. Seems like the police wanted him to not follow him. Zimmerman put himself in the position of danger. He self appointed himself to be a neighborhood vigilante, he chose to follow Trayvon. By all accounts, including Zimmerman's, Trayvon was trying to get away from Zimmerman. If he was not qualified, trained, tough enough or authorized to pursue Trayvon he could have left it to the professionals.
Truly, no that is not true. The POLICE never said they didn't want him to follow, a dispatcher said she didn't need him to do that. Didn't tell him not to, and it was a dispatcher not the police (unless that state has actual police that are the 911 operators which no one has stated that was the case).
On the other hand, the older guys account is that he followed for a ways then went BACK TO HIS VEHICLE where he was supposedly attacked by the younger guy. If the younger guy had wanted to get away then he could have while the older guy was going back to his vehicle.
Again that is the older guys account, that is an account so your statement "by all accounts" is just flat wrong.
That's the problem. Liberals like you heard "white guy shoots black guy" and you immediately wanted him arrested whether it was warrented or not.
Then your friends in the liberal media have been proven without a shadow of a doubt to have skewed the coverage, even going so far as to edit out parts of the 911 tape (that is not disputed by the way, they edited it out to make him look bad) and everybody has jumped to the conclusion that it was a racial thing.
Then they find this stuff out and realize he wasn't white so now the older guy is a "white hispanic" LMBO. White hispanic, you just can't make this stuff up.
His story is markedly different, but the other difference is an EYE WITNESS came forward and agreed with parts of his story.
My take on this has always been, let them sort it out properly. Not everyone that shoots someone should be arrested. Not everyone that claims self defense should walk.
By the evidence they had more evidence pointed to self defense than murder so they RIGHTFULLY let him walk.
I don't want people locked up that the evidence doesn't substantiate a charge against them.
Again, if he murdered that young man I hope he gets the chair.
If his story is true and the young man attacked him after he was going back to his vehicle and tried to bash his brains out on the concrete then I hope he never spends a day in jail.
I also think those that put a bounty out on his head should be in jail for soliciting murder. Anybody else that put a public bounty on someones life would be, why not them?
__________________
Let's go huntin
Last edited by Rip on 04-03-2012 at 10:09 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|