houndsnskeet
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Dec 2011
Location: Pell City, AL
Posts: 243 |
I agree, I come from conformation and it was astonishing to me there was not more education from the breed clubs to the bench show judges. I come from Dachshunds originally,Westminster breed winners at that, and our breed club has an illustrated standard, http://dachshund-dca.org/Judges%20E...edcomprehe.html , this is what is taught to judges. At our nationals, equal to Autumn Oaks, we have ringside mentoring for prospective judges. It's free and it's the only way that judge will be allowed to judge at our national. Though there's always going to be multiple interpretations because everyone likes different things, there needs to be a general standard to weed out the constant argument over what's correct and not. Like how angled a dog should be and what's over angled, how tight a dogs feet should be and what's to tight, what depth of chest is enough to allow full front movement, and what is restricting to a dog. Form follows function right? So if I have a dog who may not have the best feet or head but his gait covers ground and he has proper angles and a proper body does that dog trump a dog who's feet are perfect and head is flawless with an awful standstill swing leg hackney gate and super straight angles? These are questions as breeders we have to ask ourselves. We are breeding in form and out function and its going to ruin certain breeds. Judges are looking at what wins and assuming that is correct when it really may not be correct.
Thanks for reading
__________________
Heritage Hounds
404-354-4124
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|