UKC Forums UKC Website :: Hunting Ops :: All-Breed Sports :: Registration :: UKC Online Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Coonhounds > score this
Pages (4): « First ... « 2 3 [4]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
jabrown
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Apr 2010
Location: Jake Prairie, MO
Posts: 757

quote:
Originally posted by runnin rebels
the original advisor is prolly outdated and they changed that rule.


You can find it on page 68 of the current Advisor.

__________________
As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.
Joshua 24:15

Josh Brown
The Barber Shop
Cuba, MO
573-205-1391

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-17-2012 03:27 PM
jabrown is offline Click Here to See the Profile for jabrown Click here to Send jabrown a Private Message Click Here to Email jabrown Find more posts by jabrown Add jabrown to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Allen / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

quote:
Originally posted by max destruction
Rule 18-4 says it takes a majority vote to overturn the judges decicion?


Jesse, you would be correct when it comes to most situations. However, there are three specific situations where the rules require a majority of the cast vote. They are:

1) Scoring trees plus or minus
2) Calling time out
3) Previously scored trees

Each of these items go directly to a cast vote and where the hunting judges vote carries no more weight than any other cast member.

I've found that when it comes to the scoring of trees two to two votes are quite commonly mis-scored. I see a lot of casts deleting the points in this case. No where in the deleted section will you find where poinst are deleted in two to two votes. Should they be? That's a matter of opinion only.

The same argument can be made in that it's not listed under circle points either. It probably should be to eliminate inconsistent scoring.

The correct way of scoring the situation is circle the points. For those of you who have competed for a good several years will remember when the rulebook had no section for deleting points. Therefore, back then it may have been easier understood that when you didn't have a majority to plus (or minus) then the only option left was to circle.

Nothing has changed. You still circle. Unfortunately, the fact that we now do have deleted points for certain things, as mentioned, likely plays a role in this matter.

I've not read many comments within this thread but I'm fairly certain, considering four pages of comments, that arguments have been made that it makes better sense to delete the points. I can agree in that it is a good argument. Regardless, until it changes those points are to be circled. However, it might be a good time to start thinking about the fact that next year the UKC Chartered Breed Associations will be considering new rule proposals. Might be a good one to turn in?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-17-2012 04:29 PM
Allen / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Allen / UKC Click here to Send Allen / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Allen / UKC Find more posts by Allen / UKC Add Allen / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:40 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (4): « First ... « 2 3 [4]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)