DOC
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Sep 2003
Location:
Posts: 385 |
boy, maybe I should institute a charity for the poor doctors-lo..
it is a long-long haul, tough road that should have reward at the end... my cousin, plastic surgeon has been very-very-very successful financially, now he only practices on a limited basis, but all pro bono, sure many others do the same... has to be very tough dealing with life-death on a daily basis... great that a person who is compassionate-empathetic such as Rip has earned the opportunity to practice medicine...
Rip, appreciate your thoughts about the study to be published today in the New Enbgland Journal of Medicine, done by Rand Health Research Institute about the medicore health care in the U.S.... study of about 7,000, actually 6,712, it is random sample conducted over two years in only very large metropolitian areas, indicates care provided is consistent based upon race-income-gender-age etc... attempts to measure standard of care provided for 439 common chronic-acute conditions, overall the results indicate 55% of recommended steps for top quality care provided, some variation in defined category measures, but consistency in the overall uniformity of below par care provided, significant gap between care deserved and what was provided... not supporting this research, but wonder from your perspective concerning validity, it is skewed since only large metro areas and not represenatative... greatly appreciate your thoughts, does reflect a national profile, is it different in less metro settings, do people in areas where you have studied-practiced have more care-concern-understanding and provide higher quality of care, on-on... appreciate your thoughts when-if you get time, glad you got a great match, high quality people usually get the same in location matches...
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|