toe cutter
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Oct 2008
Location: chokeabitch river, michigan
Posts: 969 |
read the first post, not just what the last guy posted.
ok with all these posts considered, what about the original ?
why are we breeding dogs with titles to dog with titles.
titles are not traits.
if you breed only by titles then you dont know what the pups are gonna really be. its just a mixed bag of traits.
if you breed by using traits you have a idea of what your putting in the pups. the best to the best only works if both dogs had the same traits that made each the best.
if you want the papers to look good with all the titles thats fine. but select the titled dogs with the right traits ,show or nite hunt titles or what ever. but not just because it has the most titles.
i have seen people bitch about thier pup being chopped mouth on the track,it chews,its tight mouthed,its loose mouthed,small dog,big dog and after you tell them the one of the parents they bred was also chopped mouth on the track,loose mouthed,tight mouthed,big dog,little dog,slow straddle tracker,hot nose ,cold nose and on and on -ect.....
you relize they had no idea of any trait the dog had, they only saw it was a grand nite, a show ch or a dual grand with a bunch of other grands on there and others had pups "turning the crank" off that dog.
titles are dandy,but they are not traits and should not be used in a breeding program without considering traits too.
and traits are not just looks,the traits determine the abilty and style of hunting too.
i aint a pro breeder,i only hunt what i breed and breed the ones i like to hunt. maybe i missed the point here, is it abilty vs looks.cause it is possible to have both if you use traits as a guideline.
__________________
Randal Raper -
RED EAGLE MACK BRED WALKER DOGS
Last edited by toe cutter on 02-09-2012 at 06:32 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|