Buckshot
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: ALABAMA
Posts: 5183 |
Somebody posted a few minutes ago on the CoonDawgs.com forum this:
quote:
well i have to say last night i was very disappointed in the astro's performance, we hunted some ultra thick bottoms and lost communication for long periods of time, after the dogs were treed it would pick em up on and off..... and the sad part is they only treed 600yds away. very,very disappointed... looks like the tracker will be around my dogs neck during the summer months, the problem seems to be with the dog unit not being able to communicate with the handheld due to more dense cover, after we leashed the dogs and headed out we are still able to follow our tracks out perfect with no problems with gps reception on the handheld or the dog unit, i have done nothing but talk the system up so far and really didn't want to make such a negative comment, however i felt the flaws needed to be discussed and if you are having similar experiences please tell
The post was from a guy in Alabma.
Hogguide is in TN, the above quote is AL, and Bruce is in FL.
3 southern states with 3 diiferent terrains, and 3 totally different ranges.
Now it makes me wonder about dead zones. I know I talked with you on the phone before Bruce about the dead zones as I have experienced it in areas with my Garmin truck GPS.
I know heavy covering also has an effect as I have lost signal on both my satellite radio and Garmin truck GPS in thick covering.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|