UKC Forums UKC Website :: Hunting Ops :: All-Breed Sports :: Registration :: UKC Online Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Coonhounds > Off Topic > Clinton's body list
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
truly
Banned

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: minnesota
Posts: 3685

quote:
Originally posted by rance56
i can understand the democrat vs republican debate, but truly is takign this to a capilitis vs socialist debate. he evens thinks bill clintions way of running a country is wrong. he admires china over the usa and thinks its ok for the governement to take 9 out of 10 dollars a person makes.not a corporation, but a individual.

i hope those of yall on the left will publically denounce this way of thinking. sociaism has been tried and fails. people like truly are a enemy of the usa and our way of life. they dont deserve this great country that we live in

Rance if you know anything about the specifics about the Boston Tea Party, this country came to be because of a dispute in which corporations [tea importers] were given unfair tax benefits that were not extended to all. Tax policies were designed with the specific intent of bailing out the India Tea Company with no regard to the well being of the average citizen. Policy that favored corporations and the wealth class. Back then it was as it is now- the wealthy and corporations have the ear of the lawmakers and can get policies designed for their well being rather than ours. It was opposition to this that started the revolution that created America.....
It is an American as it can get to want tax policies that benefit the majority of Americans. Folks like you who refuse to have an honest conversation about tax policy are the enemy of the USA and our way of life.

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 08:40 PM
truly is offline Click Here to See the Profile for truly Click here to Send truly a Private Message Find more posts by truly Add truly to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
john Duemmer
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 4005

We have the highest corporate tax rates in the world, and it is becoming more and more common for american companys to do business in other parts of the world. So i would like for you Libs to explain to me how taxing them and regulating them to the point where in order to be profitable for their stockholders they are forced to relocate to another part of the world is going to help our economy and provide jobs for americans. Punish those evil corporations for their sucess, make those capitalist pigs suffer, GET EM, even if you destroy america in the process.

__________________
Everything that makes them a COONDOG is on the inside

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 09:03 PM
john Duemmer is offline Click Here to See the Profile for john Duemmer Click here to Send john Duemmer a Private Message Click Here to Email john Duemmer Find more posts by john Duemmer Add john Duemmer to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rance56
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4046

quote:
Originally posted by truly
It occurred to me after rereading that you most likely have a fundamental misunderstanding of how our income tax [marginal] rate system works.
Our current system stands at:
10% up to $8925
15% up to $36,250
25% up to $87,850
28% up to $398,350
35% up to $400,000
and 39.6% above $400,000
The misunderstanding that most folks have is to think that someone who makes $400,001 pays an income tax rate of 39.6%. In fact the reality is that they pay that rate on only one dollar. they then pay 35% on the money they made between 398,350 and 400,000. and they pay 28% on the money they made between 87,850 and 398,350. and they pay25% on the money between 36,250 and 87,850. and they pay 15% on the money between 8925 and 36,250. and they pay 10% on the first 8925.
So the guy who moans and complains that because he made 400,001 complains cause he is in the 39.6% tax rate when in fact the majority of the money that he made will be taxed in the 28% range. Look at how bizarre that it is that we have a 35% tax rate for the $1650 dollars that a person makes between 398,350 and 400,000! Why bother to have that rate at all?
But to me the hidden injustice in this is that someone making around 100,000 pays almost the same rate as someone making 395,000$ per year!?!? And obviously someone making 395k$ per year is going to have a lot more deductions [mortgage interest alone!] and would therefore actually pay a lower "effective" rate when it is all said and done.
Our tax code is full of all sorts of "slight of hand" maneuvers like this that almost entirely benefit the wealth class. Yes, EITC benefits the working poor, but the middle class working American in the 50-100k$ is getting hit the hardest. The rich and the poor get handouts, the middle carries their weight.



i sit for the CFP exam in a few months, i have a very good grasp of how taxes work and i stand by my comment. i dont care if i had to pay 90% on just $1 dollar i earned i would refuse to be in busines or quite posibly even live in that country

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 10:39 PM
rance56 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rance56 Click here to Send rance56 a Private Message Click Here to Email rance56 Find more posts by rance56 Add rance56 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rance56
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4046

quote:
Originally posted by truly
Rance if you know anything about the specifics about the Boston Tea Party, this country came to be because of a dispute in which corporations [tea importers] were given unfair tax benefits that were not extended to all. Tax policies were designed with the specific intent of bailing out the India Tea Company with no regard to the well being of the average citizen. Policy that favored corporations and the wealth class. Back then it was as it is now- the wealthy and corporations have the ear of the lawmakers and can get policies designed for their well being rather than ours. It was opposition to this that started the revolution that created America.....
It is an American as it can get to want tax policies that benefit the majority of Americans. Folks like you who refuse to have an honest conversation about tax policy are the enemy of the USA and our way of life.



lol, it actually made tea quite cheap,even cheaper then smuggler so how did it hurt the average person?

the tea party was more about creating a monolply, doing it in secret essentially an giving no represenation to those that were effected by it, along with re-asserting control of the colonies by the brits.

AND JUST HOW CAN ANYONE HAVE AN HONEST CONVERSATION WITH A LAIR AND DISTORTER OF TRUTH AS YOU?

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 10:49 PM
rance56 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rance56 Click here to Send rance56 a Private Message Click Here to Email rance56 Find more posts by rance56 Add rance56 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
truly
Banned

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: minnesota
Posts: 3685

quote:
Originally posted by john Duemmer
We have the highest corporate tax rates in the world, and it is becoming more and more common for american companys to do business in other parts of the world. So i would like for you Libs to explain to me how taxing them and regulating them to the point where in order to be profitable for their stockholders they are forced to relocate to another part of the world is going to help our economy and provide jobs for americans. Punish those evil corporations for their sucess, make those capitalist pigs suffer, GET EM, even if you destroy america in the process.
except we give so many corporations such huge loopholes that their effective tax rate is actually even with most of the rest of the globe. And the biggest and most profitable of those corps, like the India Tea Company have been able to get loopholes created just for them, so that they pay a much lower rate, and in many cases NO CORPORATE TAX AT ALL, AND IN SOME THEY EVEN GET A CREDIT.
And btw, you state "the tea party was more about creating a monolply" when in fact the tea party was all about fighting that monopoly.

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 11:00 PM
truly is offline Click Here to See the Profile for truly Click here to Send truly a Private Message Find more posts by truly Add truly to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
truly
Banned

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: minnesota
Posts: 3685

Last November, Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy issued a major study of the federal income taxes paid, or not paid, by 280 big, profitable Fortune 500 corporations. That report found, among other things, that 30 of the companies paid no net federal income tax from 2008 through 2010. New information for 2011 shows that almost all these 30 companies have maintained their tax dodging ways.
In fact, all but four of the 30 companies remained in the no-federal-income-tax category over the 2008-11 period.
Over the four years:
# 26 of the 30 companies continued to enjoy negative federal income tax rates. That means they still made more money after tax than before tax over the four years!
# Of the remaining four companies, three paid four- year effective tax rates of less than 4 percent (specifically, 0.2%, 2.0% and 3.8%). One company paid a 2008-11 tax rate of 10.9 percent.
# In total, 2008-11 federal income taxes for the 30 companies remained negative, despite $205 billion in pretax U.S. profits. Overall, they enjoyed an average effective federal income tax rate of –3.1 percent over the four years.
http://www.ctj.org/pdf/notax2012.pdf
Check out that last bullet point- 30 companies, negative tax rate- as in the got more money back than they ever paid in ON 205 BILLION OF PROFIT! IF THEY HAD EVEN PAID IN AT A 28% RATE AS MANY AMERICANS DO THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN 57.4 BILLION DOLLARS! How can you justify them not paying in at a similar rate to what we working class Americans do?

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 11:06 PM
truly is offline Click Here to See the Profile for truly Click here to Send truly a Private Message Find more posts by truly Add truly to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rance56
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4046

quote:
Originally posted by truly
Last November, Citizens for Tax Justice and the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy issued a major study of the federal income taxes paid, or not paid, by 280 big, profitable Fortune 500 corporations. That report found, among other things, that 30 of the companies paid no net federal income tax from 2008 through 2010. New information for 2011 shows that almost all these 30 companies have maintained their tax dodging ways.
In fact, all but four of the 30 companies remained in the no-federal-income-tax category over the 2008-11 period.
Over the four years:
# 26 of the 30 companies continued to enjoy negative federal income tax rates. That means they still made more money after tax than before tax over the four years!
# Of the remaining four companies, three paid four- year effective tax rates of less than 4 percent (specifically, 0.2%, 2.0% and 3.8%). One company paid a 2008-11 tax rate of 10.9 percent.
# In total, 2008-11 federal income taxes for the 30 companies remained negative, despite $205 billion in pretax U.S. profits. Overall, they enjoyed an average effective federal income tax rate of –3.1 percent over the four years.
http://www.ctj.org/pdf/notax2012.pdf
Check out that last bullet point- 30 companies, negative tax rate- as in the got more money back than they ever paid in ON 205 BILLION OF PROFIT! IF THEY HAD EVEN PAID IN AT A 28% RATE AS MANY AMERICANS DO THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN 57.4 BILLION DOLLARS! How can you justify them not paying in at a similar rate to what we working class Americans do?




just curious, who is not saying we need tax reform in this country?

AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAX REFORM AND THE SOCIALIST AGENDA YOU SPEW ON HERE.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 11:14 PM
rance56 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rance56 Click here to Send rance56 a Private Message Click Here to Email rance56 Find more posts by rance56 Add rance56 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Diggerman
Banned

Registered: Dec 2008
Location: S.W. Wisc.
Posts: 734

quote:
Originally posted by truly
It occurred to me after rereading that you most likely have a fundamental misunderstanding of how our income tax [marginal] rate system works.
Our current system stands at:
10% up to $8925
15% up to $36,250
25% up to $87,850
28% up to $398,350
35% up to $400,000
and 39.6% above $400,000
The misunderstanding that most folks have is to think that someone who makes $400,001 pays an income tax rate of 39.6%. In fact the reality is that they pay that rate on only one dollar. they then pay 35% on the money they made between 398,350 and 400,000. and they pay 28% on the money they made between 87,850 and 398,350. and they pay25% on the money between 36,250 and 87,850. and they pay 15% on the money between 8925 and 36,250. and they pay 10% on the first 8925.
So the guy who moans and complains that because he made 400,001 complains cause he is in the 39.6% tax rate when in fact the majority of the money that he made will be taxed in the 28% range. Look at how bizarre that it is that we have a 35% tax rate for the $1650 dollars that a person makes between 398,350 and 400,000! Why bother to have that rate at all?
But to me the hidden injustice in this is that someone making around 100,000 pays almost the same rate as someone making 395,000$ per year!?!? And obviously someone making 395k$ per year is going to have a lot more deductions [mortgage interest alone!] and would therefore actually pay a lower "effective" rate when it is all said and done.
Our tax code is full of all sorts of "slight of hand" maneuvers like this that almost entirely benefit the wealth class. Yes, EITC benefits the working poor, but the middle class working American in the 50-100k$ is getting hit the hardest. The rich and the poor get handouts, the middle carries their weight.


TAX RATE, understand that a person makeing $398,000.00 pays about $104,250.00 in fed taxs for the priviledge of liveing in this country,HOWEVER a person only willing to make $9000.00 per year will pay $900.00 in federal taxes AND will get a tax CREDIT of about $3,500.00 dollars ,AND will be eligible for low income houseing,food stamps ,Badgercare,cell phones etc.etc. WHAT MORE DO YOU WANT?

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-20-2013 11:54 PM
Diggerman is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Diggerman Click here to Send Diggerman a Private Message Click Here to Email Diggerman Find more posts by Diggerman Add Diggerman to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Erik Fisher
UKC Forum Member

Registered: May 2004
Location:
Posts: 349

Re: Hmmmm....?

quote:
Originally posted by Triple K Kennel
It doesn't matter if they are deadbeats, their vote counted as much as anyone.
The Majority means there were folks from different walks of life, from the Super Rich to the Very Poor-----It takes all kinds to make the World to go around.....


Idk who the best or worst is or was but I can tell you this. If you're not employed, retired, disabled, or applied for at least 20 jobs per year. ( on record) you shouldn't have a right to vote. That's the problem with this country is it was built on hard work and patriotism and ther doesn't seem to be ALOT of either anymore. (Hence all the outsourcing to other countries). We've gotten LAZY as a nation in general and we are the only ones who can change it. Work hard/ support what you believe! That would fix a whole lot! Not saying the guys that posted here don't. But MANY people in this great country don't do either let alone one of the two!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 12:41 AM
Erik Fisher is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Erik Fisher Click here to Send Erik Fisher a Private Message Click Here to Email Erik Fisher Find more posts by Erik Fisher Add Erik Fisher to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
john nannemann
UKC Forum Member

Registered: May 2008
Location: southcentral arkansas
Posts: 1581

quote:
Originally posted by truly
It occurred to me a
Our tax code is full of all sorts of "slight of hand" maneuvers like this that almost entirely benefit the wealth class. Yes, EITC benefits the working poor, but the middle class working American in the 50-100k$ is getting hit the hardest. The rich and the poor get handouts, the middle carries their weight.




whooo, you are one slow locator. sniffing all around it right chair. locate benny, give it the dying bawl PLEASE.

most of those tax code loopholes were put there by democommies- the reason they never want to discuss a flat rate across the board- no way to control, reward, and PUNISH in their ARBITRARY fashion.

your last line "the rich and the poor get handouts" is spot on- this is the majority of the commiecrat constituency, just like i been trying to tell you for YEARS.
you don't have to take my learned word for it benny, here's a link you should read in entirety:
http://www.debt.org/faqs/americans-...hics-democrats/

pay close attention to the part about the poor dupes and then under the heading "super- rich".

most of the current higher income earners- the one's usually referred to as "middle class", are generally voting republican, for lack of a better choice, in a last ditch hope to hang on to what little property we have earned to call our own.



v
v
v
v
v
v
v

__________________
"it's easy to sit there and say you'd like to have more money. and i guess that's what i like about it. it's easy. just sitting there, rocking back and forth, wanting that money."
Jack Handy

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 01:14 AM
john nannemann is offline Click Here to See the Profile for john nannemann Click here to Send john nannemann a Private Message Find more posts by john nannemann Add john nannemann to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rance56
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4046

http://www.fidelity.com/inside-fide...ionaire-outlook

The above article states over 80 percent of USA millionaires are self made. So how in a system where the middle class is so opressed are they able to become millionaires. The true misconception is that the majority of the rich had it handed to them. But don't let actual facts get in your way comrade ben

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Last edited by rance56 on 03-21-2013 at 01:50 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 01:48 AM
rance56 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rance56 Click here to Send rance56 a Private Message Click Here to Email rance56 Find more posts by rance56 Add rance56 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Triple K Kennel
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Feb 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 4547

Re: Re: Hmmmm....?

quote:
Originally posted by Erik Fisher
Idk who the best or worst is or was but I can tell you this. If you're not employed, retired, disabled, or applied for at least 20 jobs per year. ( on record) you shouldn't have a right to vote. That's the problem with this country is it was built on hard work and patriotism and ther doesn't seem to be ALOT of either anymore. (Hence all the outsourcing to other countries). We've gotten LAZY as a nation in general and we are the only ones who can change it. Work hard/ support what you believe! That would fix a whole lot! Not saying the guys that posted here don't. But MANY people in this great country don't do either let alone one of the two!



I have to disagree, the way I see it is if you are a United States Citizen, then you have that Right.......this is the American way.......

__________________
Track B4 Tree









Quality, Dependable Coon Lights--Built by a Coonhunter for Coonhunters
==================================
** Superior Lites

** Nitehunters.com

** Zepp's--Quality Products

** Tall Timber
Lights


**Boss Lights & Boss Pro


** They Twist it until they start believing it themselves**















Purina Dog Food
** Proven Results **

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Competition Coonhunters and Politicians
** Win anyway you have to & tell everyone what they want to hear **

Last edited by Triple K Kennel on 03-21-2013 at 04:24 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 02:54 AM
Triple K Kennel is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Triple K Kennel Click here to Send Triple K Kennel a Private Message Find more posts by Triple K Kennel Add Triple K Kennel to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
truly
Banned

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: minnesota
Posts: 3685

quote:
Originally posted by rance56
just curious, who is not saying we need tax reform in this country?

AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAX REFORM AND THE SOCIALIST AGENDA YOU SPEW ON HERE.

THe problem with trying to tackle tax reform is that righties/conservatives/republicans refuse to consider any revenue increase. They consider closing tax loopholes to be a tax increase and refuse to consider it. they won't consider raising rates. they won't consider any new taxes. so all they have left is cutting taxes. and righties love to talk about the old "tough dining room table decisions" made about finances. If your family was struggling with financial issues, having a hard time making ends meet, would you automatically rule out increasing your income? raising your revenue stream? wouldn't that be foolish? a democrat would consider cutting expenditures while also acknowledging that they might need to raise income by putting a little overtime in or picking up a second job, or performing better at their job so that they got a pay raise.
Republicans can never be taken seriously on budgetary issues when they refuse to consider the revenue side of any balance sheet.

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 04:15 AM
truly is offline Click Here to See the Profile for truly Click here to Send truly a Private Message Find more posts by truly Add truly to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Diggerman
Banned

Registered: Dec 2008
Location: S.W. Wisc.
Posts: 734

quote:
Originally posted by truly
THe problem with trying to tackle tax reform is that righties/conservatives/republicans refuse to consider any revenue increase. They consider closing tax loopholes to be a tax increase and refuse to consider it. they won't consider raising rates. they won't consider any new taxes. so all they have left is cutting taxes. and righties love to talk about the old "tough dining room table decisions" made about finances. If your family was struggling with financial issues, having a hard time making ends meet, would you automatically rule out increasing your income? raising your revenue stream? wouldn't that be foolish? a democrat would consider cutting expenditures while also acknowledging that they might need to raise income by putting a little overtime in or picking up a second job, or performing better at their job so that they got a pay raise.
Republicans can never be taken seriously on budgetary issues when they refuse to consider the revenue side of any balance sheet.

Lets see, How many jobs would you suggest they take? Useing your annalogy th "family" already has 4 jobs. Check out Gov. spendings percent of GDP. Then tell me what level you are comfortable with.

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 01:14 PM
Diggerman is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Diggerman Click here to Send Diggerman a Private Message Click Here to Email Diggerman Find more posts by Diggerman Add Diggerman to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rance56
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4046

quote:
Originally posted by truly
THe problem with trying to tackle tax reform is that righties/conservatives/republicans refuse to consider any revenue increase. They consider closing tax loopholes to be a tax increase and refuse to consider it. they won't consider raising rates. they won't consider any new taxes. so all they have left is cutting taxes. and righties love to talk about the old "tough dining room table decisions" made about finances. If your family was struggling with financial issues, having a hard time making ends meet, would you automatically rule out increasing your income? raising your revenue stream? wouldn't that be foolish? a democrat would consider cutting expenditures while also acknowledging that they might need to raise income by putting a little overtime in or picking up a second job, or performing better at their job so that they got a pay raise.
Republicans can never be taken seriously on budgetary issues when they refuse to consider the revenue side of any balance sheet.



WAIT A MINUTE. WASNT IT A TAX INCREASE ON THOSE MAKING OVER 400K EARLIER THIS YEAR THAT THE REPUBLICANS AGREED TO THAT ALLOWED US TO AVOID GOING OFF THE FISCAL CLIFF? and i believe the only spending cuts we got was when they forced upon us by the sequester.

IN ADDITION, TAXES WENT UP ON MOST ALL AMERICANS WITH 2% PAYROLL TAX INCREASE.

PLEASE STOP WITH THE LIES!!!!!!!!

HERE IS THE PROOF IN BLACKA AND WHITE FACTS!

http://www.businessweek.com/article...ll-all-pay-more

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Last edited by rance56 on 03-21-2013 at 02:03 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 01:57 PM
rance56 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rance56 Click here to Send rance56 a Private Message Click Here to Email rance56 Find more posts by rance56 Add rance56 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
john nannemann
UKC Forum Member

Registered: May 2008
Location: southcentral arkansas
Posts: 1581

quote:
Originally posted by truly
THe problem with trying to tackle tax reform is that righties/conservatives/republicans refuse to consider any revenue increase. They consider closing tax loopholes to be a tax increase and refuse to consider it. they won't consider raising rates. they won't consider any new taxes. so all they have left is cutting taxes. and righties love to talk about the old "tough dining room table decisions" made about finances. If your family was struggling with financial issues, having a hard time making ends meet, would you automatically rule out increasing your income? raising your revenue stream? wouldn't that be foolish? a democrat would consider cutting expenditures while also acknowledging that they might need to raise income by putting a little overtime in or picking up a second job, or performing better at their job so that they got a pay raise.
Republicans can never be taken seriously on budgetary issues when they refuse to consider the revenue side of any balance sheet.



Lmfao, your fictional family considers theft and sale of the neighbors money and property to be a viable "second job". Looting for fun and profit!





v
V
V
V
V

__________________
"it's easy to sit there and say you'd like to have more money. and i guess that's what i like about it. it's easy. just sitting there, rocking back and forth, wanting that money."
Jack Handy

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 03:36 PM
john nannemann is offline Click Here to See the Profile for john nannemann Click here to Send john nannemann a Private Message Find more posts by john nannemann Add john nannemann to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rance56
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville FL
Posts: 4046

quote:
Originally posted by john nannemann
Lmfao, your fictional family considers theft and sale of the neighbors money and property to be a viable "second job". Looting for fun and profit!





v
V
V
V
V



or his fictional family will get addtional "revenue" by buying things on a CREDIT CARD in their kids name.

__________________
the oldest ride in the park, but still the longest line.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 06:10 PM
rance56 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rance56 Click here to Send rance56 a Private Message Click Here to Email rance56 Find more posts by rance56 Add rance56 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
truly
Banned

Registered: Nov 2005
Location: minnesota
Posts: 3685

quote:
Originally posted by rance56
just curious, who is not saying we need tax reform in this country?

AND THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TAX REFORM AND THE SOCIALIST AGENDA YOU SPEW ON HERE.

If you haven't noticed most of our congress is saying that we don't need reform. Some say it with words, some with actions, others with inaction. THe big corporations that are making money hand over fist while not paying any taxes don't want change either.

Suggesting that we have an open mind to how our taxation system works and what possible solutions are is not socialist agenda. having a closed mind is conservatism, but there is a huge gap between conservatism and socialism. I used the 90% top marginal rate in my hypothetical for two reasons- 1, it makes it easier to see cause and effect, and 2, because America has actually done it before and we survived it just fine. Again, relating to family finances, there are some measures that a family would take short turn to get their financial budget back in order that they would not live with long term. I have never actually seen anyone suggest that we should try a top marginal rate of 90% again. But how about we have the wealth class pay the same rate as we do? Just for a few years anyway? 3-5 years of the wealth class paying the same rates as the working class would do wonders for our budget crisis and WOULD NOT DESTROY THE ECONOMY!

__________________
patriotism is supporting your country all of the time and your government when it deserves it.
if you think the price of education is high, check out the cost of ignorance!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 07:14 PM
truly is offline Click Here to See the Profile for truly Click here to Send truly a Private Message Find more posts by truly Add truly to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
markknepp
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2011
Location: indiana
Posts: 236

I remember why stay away from this side of the board.


Here's my opinion. Repubs and Dems have ran the country for the last 100 plus years and are both to blame.

If you hired two guys to work together and all they got done was name calling and blaming each other neither would have a job very long. But everyone fiercely defends their chosen side and we keep voting them in. Wake up people. I bet ninety percent of you guys know which party you will vote for next election already. Keep on bickering with each about whose fault it is but continue putting the same two gangs in office and lie to yourself about them getting anything done. This kind of thing is the problem with America.


You know what is great about America though. The fact that we can have these discussions. We have our faults but I'll take my chances in this country.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 10:26 PM
markknepp is offline Click Here to See the Profile for markknepp Click here to Send markknepp a Private Message Click Here to Email markknepp Find more posts by markknepp Add markknepp to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Wingman66
Banned

Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Occupied TN CSA
Posts: 1877

quote:
We have the highest corporate tax rates in the world, and it is becoming more and more common for american companys to do business in other parts of the world. So i would like for you Libs to explain to me how taxing them and regulating them to the point where in order to be profitable for their stockholders they are forced to relocate to another part of the world is going to help our economy and provide jobs for americans. Punish those evil corporations for their sucess, make those capitalist pigs suffer, GET EM, even if you destroy america in the process.

I ain't a lib but I feel that is a lot of where the problem is. I'd just about bet the owners of those companies won't move and become a citizen of those countries either. Personal taxes in those places would eat you alive. You can do business anywhere in the world that will let you. Thats not the problem. If China wants to sell American cars they can send a boat to pick them up with a good check at whatever profit we need to keep our doors open and our workers employed. Other than that, build your own cars and stay out of our Country. The car manufactures will meet the demand with our workers I assure you. If you want to sell cars to China you move to China, build a factory in China, use China workers and abide by Chinas business and tax codes.

Folks want to say I can't make a profit because of taxes. Its the governments fault, its obamas fault whine whine whine. When you made your business plans did you not take that into consideration? The truth is you tried your best and failed. You could not operate a business and its that simple. You can gripe at what the government SPENDS the tax money you collected for them on, but don't blame them for your failed attempt at being a business owner.

__________________
I have to say yall got a good little support group going. Huddle together so yall can keep warm...trackdriver

"Kim Jong-Un speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.” An actual sitting US President said that. Let that sink in.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-21-2013 11:22 PM
Wingman66 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Wingman66 Click here to Send Wingman66 a Private Message Click Here to Email Wingman66 Find more posts by Wingman66 Add Wingman66 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
oscar
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Feb 2005
Location: ohio
Posts: 145

GREAT POST !!!! Mark Knepp

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-22-2013 02:12 AM
oscar is offline Click Here to See the Profile for oscar Click here to Send oscar a Private Message Click Here to Email oscar Find more posts by oscar Add oscar to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Diggerman
Banned

Registered: Dec 2008
Location: S.W. Wisc.
Posts: 734

quote:
Originally posted by Wingman66
I ain't a lib but I feel that is a lot of where the problem is. I'd just about bet the owners of those companies won't move and become a citizen of those countries either. Personal taxes in those places would eat you alive. You can do business anywhere in the world that will let you. Thats not the problem. If China wants to sell American cars they can send a boat to pick them up with a good check at whatever profit we need to keep our doors open and our workers employed. Other than that, build your own cars and stay out of our Country. The car manufactures will meet the demand with our workers I assure you. If you want to sell cars to China you move to China, build a factory in China, use China workers and abide by Chinas business and tax codes.

Folks want to say I can't make a profit because of taxes. Its the governments fault, its obamas fault whine whine whine. When you made your business plans did you not take that into consideration? The truth is you tried your best and failed. You could not operate a business and its that simple. You can gripe at what the government SPENDS the tax money you collected for them on, but don't blame them for your failed attempt at being a business owner.


Well you started this post out with a fib and then went on and made it a fairy tale.

__________________
All my life I wanted to be somebody, now I realize I should have been more specific. I carry a gun because I am too young to die and too old to take an asswhoopin.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-22-2013 03:29 AM
Diggerman is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Diggerman Click here to Send Diggerman a Private Message Click Here to Email Diggerman Find more posts by Diggerman Add Diggerman to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Wingman66
Banned

Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Occupied TN CSA
Posts: 1877

Fairy tale lol. I'll tell you who is living in a fairy tale. The stockholder who buys stock in a company that can't make enough profit to even pay their taxes.

__________________
I have to say yall got a good little support group going. Huddle together so yall can keep warm...trackdriver

"Kim Jong-Un speaks and his people sit up at attention. I want my people to do the same.” An actual sitting US President said that. Let that sink in.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 03-22-2013 03:38 AM
Wingman66 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Wingman66 Click here to Send Wingman66 a Private Message Click Here to Email Wingman66 Find more posts by Wingman66 Add Wingman66 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:18 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (3): « 1 2 [3]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)