blackflagginit
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Oct 2012
Location: burnt district MO/KS border
Posts: 787 |
Re: Re: well
quote: Originally posted by garminguru
Wrong! If a dog locates it has nothing to do with trailing, all with the treeing process. I explained this earlier!
the hole in your theory is that you assume striking a dog means it is trailing, that theory doesnt hold water because of 2 other UKC rules, having to "strike" a dog on or before the 3rd bark (says nothing of the dog having to be TRAILING) and the fact a dog has to be STRUCK before it can be TREED. there can always be a claim made it was a layup coon, and no way to prove otherwise...and ukc's own rules say you have to claim the "strike" points before you can claim the tree points. there isnt even a subrule to draw a line through those strike points, as they would be in the case of the tree points for a dog struck and treed on a coon caught on the ground for instance.
I personaly scratched dogs for being silent on 2 different occasions in the past, only to have the MOH reverse my ruling when we got back to the club.......could i have filed a formal complaint and all that jazz, sure.........but i was a non hunting judge in one, and ended up stompin the sudds out of the other before the night was done anyway......
2 different moh, prob 15yrs apart, and both reversed the ruling because in there opinion there was no way to prove the dog didnt open a few feet from the tree and then tree, and because of the layup example and other rules quoted above.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|