brogy
Guest
Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A |
This is what the opposition is saying;
"I don't think there is appetite at the Legislature to make any changes,'' said Rep. Tony Cornish, R-Good Thunder, a former DNR conservation officer. "We can't solve all the world's problems with over-regulation.''
Meanwhile, Cornish said few dogs are caught in traps. "I think they should just accept it as one of those unfortunate things,'' he said.
Con Christianson, a trapper and legislative liaison for the Minnesota Trappers Association, said requiring the traps to be 5 feet off the ground would make them useless to trappers seeking bobcats and raccoons.
"There would be problems for trappers,'' said Christianson, whose group hasn't taken a formal position on the legislation. "There are a lot of traps out there, and the number of incidents are very, very few, so what would you be fixing?''
Said Cornish: "People should realize a restriction like this basically knocks out trapping raccoons, which is a terrible pest for our waterfowl.''
If this isn't enough to motivate you what is? When you're own dog gets killed?
Very, very, very few incidents.... Compared to what? What houndsmen has never encountered a 220 or doesn't know someone whose dog has been caught?
Pests for our waterfowl? They didn't care about that issue in 2005 when they put the season back on us.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|