UKC Forums UKC Website :: Hunting Ops :: All-Breed Sports :: Registration :: UKC Online Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Coonhounds > TWBFA Board of Directors-Standard Changes?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Sammy
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 233

For some people's information Phil Newland has numerous wins with his beagle dogs, Fire River Lacy, dual champion, was inducted into the hall of fame and was ownded by Phil Newland, he has raised a whole litter of dual champion beagles with Hal Davis, he also owned dual champion Fire River Bridget. He also owned Nt.Ch. Tree Hammering Rocky, out of Miller's Little Joker. Phil has hunted with Allen Snedegar, Rick Emerson, Elwood Simmons, Terry Daniels and Alan Kalal along with others. I also know for a fact that Phil hunts he comes all the way to Iowa to pheasant hunt, and you know you love to hunt when you come all the way to Iowa...LOL...Phil wanted you all to know that he is a hunter, with coonhounds, beagles and bird dogs, and if you would like to visit with him just call him he'll visit with you about it!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-11-2006 06:17 PM
Sammy is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Sammy Click here to Send Sammy a Private Message Click Here to Email Sammy Find more posts by Sammy Add Sammy to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Penny Jessup
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: Rural Hall, NC
Posts: 654

Re: That's my concern as well as Todd

quote:
Originally posted by StackemUp
Within the post from Todd Kellum to Penny to Curt we went from just formatting the standards to changing!




To clarify, my reference to making changes was in regards to changing wording to agree with how the association may want to state something. My way of thinking is that we can sometimes use more descriptive language to better explain what we mean in such a way that the ORIGINAL BREED STANDARD IS better understood. I was in not suggesting we change the standard of what we want our hounds to be. I actually do think the flexibility and variety within the breeds is a good thing.

__________________
KENTUCKY MTN. ENGLISH KENNEL
Rural Hall, NC

Penny and Jody Jessup
Lydia and Christopher
Cell PH #859-339-7992

www.kentuckymtnenglish.com

Home of.....
WSHOWCH NITECH CCH GRCH 'PR' Kentucky Mtn Diamond Cutter
*2014 Overall UKC World Show Champion
*2014 Overall Purina Show Dog of the Year leader
*2014 AKC Westminster Invitee
*2014 AKC Best In Show Owner/Handled
*2013 UKC Best In Show
*2013 UKC #1 Coonhound Overall in Top 10 points

WSHOWCH CCH GRCH 'PR' Kentucky Mtn Cinderella Girl
*2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 UKC World Champin English Female
*AKC Conformation Champion
*2013 Overall UKC World Show Champion


GRCH GRNITECH 'PR' Haile's Red River DNA-P -
*2012 UKC TRIPLE COWN WINNER *2012 AKC World Reserve Hunt Champion
*2011 PURINA OUTSTANDING NITE HUNT COONHOUND OF THE YEAR - At Stud

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-11-2006 07:43 PM
Penny Jessup is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Penny Jessup Click here to Send Penny Jessup a Private Message Click Here to Email Penny Jessup Visit Penny Jessup's homepage! Find more posts by Penny Jessup Add Penny Jessup to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
StackemUp
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

This was never about his abiltity

to hunt-or-show! It has never been a decision of pleasure, competitive or show! I hope a voice from all venues will be present. Have we forgotten.... bear hunters, lion hunters, deer hunters.... We have a strong representation within these sports with UKC registered Treeing Walkers.

This was about the fact that a standard is "rumored" of being changed and at this time the TWBFA hasn't announced to the membership it's intention. It's about the fact that the historical decisions in that association were made by committees. So where is the committee on this?

If it is that Phil has been asked to make the final say in this matter, then we as the membership - PAID membership - would hope that the board would publish such happenings, not to mention both Phil and the BOD be prepared to answer all and any questions/concerns which the membership has!

I have personally been advised from an attending member that the B&T membership group was presented with "changes". In knowing this I believe a big "stink" is out there. From my understanding UKC would like to see that all breed standards be more uniform. But isn't each breed individualized? What happened to simple formatting?

The issues about competitive hunters vs pleasure hunters; show dogs vs hunted dogs. All of us have our own opinions of what we do with our dogs. I don't ask you to feed my dogs, therefore I don't ask you to accept the type of dog I like or what I do with my dogs. We all have an opinion on what or how we participate in this sport. The matter of breeders producing dogs that may or may not hunt isn't an issue at hand. We always have and always will have Just "hunters" and just "show" TW. It's been like this since the late 70's. Research your TW handbooks and you'll see all the dual titles of world winners or sectional winners -vs- now. We can't point the finger at one person. We are all quilty of this! We breed for what we want! We'll never change! It's the society we are in.

Get back to this issue at hand!!!

To the TWBFA BOD..... have "format" recommendations been made to the association about the breed standard? If so how will this matter be handled, processed, and made public to the membership. Do we have a chance to voice our opinions for the formatting? When will this "formatting" become print? If we have concerns about this current standard who do we direct our concerns to/with.

That's all I want to know!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-11-2006 08:04 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
StackemUp
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

that's the concern

Kathy's article "to me" was that they were formatting. Formatting to me means getting all points of interest in the same order, being consistent with veribage, using the same source of words.... formatting.

But to what I understand the "formatted" version presented to the B&T members changes the length of the ear from "reaching the end .... to long". So that's a little bit of a change.... IN MY OPINION. But some can see that as long as it reaches "the end" it can be longer.... so I don't know what's going on.

So the entire questions is ...... has UKC asked for formatting or have they made changes?

Can't answer what is going on with the TW standard, because I'm not sure what was presented to the board. If they have been given a "formatted" suggestion no one is noting the status or the clubs intentions!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-11-2006 09:19 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Tardawg
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Faribault, Minnesota
Posts: 838

Tricia and who ever else

this may concern...........I can not belive you people will start a post like this on a Rumor !! All that U.K.C. has asked was to look at making the six breed standard more defined for the people and for the judges, that is all that I understood that they wanted. I will tell you one thing for sure and I have nothing against anyone on here voicing their opinion, but I can assure you that Phil Newland will not be making any changes PERIOD. This topic will be discussed by the T.W.B.F.A Board of Directors and Officers and we will contact U.K.C. with the results. Thank you, Alan Kalal

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-12-2006 04:24 AM
Tardawg is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Tardawg Click here to Send Tardawg a Private Message Click Here to Email Tardawg Find more posts by Tardawg Add Tardawg to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
warn
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2003
Location: tekonsha mich
Posts: 2025

well said alan

__________________
if its there eventually it will look

Mark Warner

"HOME OF PREDAWN KENNELS"

http://www.tekonshathunder.homestead.com

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-12-2006 04:50 AM
warn is offline Click Here to See the Profile for warn Click here to Send warn a Private Message Click Here to Email warn Find more posts by warn Add warn to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
StackemUp
Guest

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

Thank you Alan

That what we as the membership needed for assurance.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-12-2006 01:26 PM
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Todd K / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Kalamazoo, Mich.
Posts: 6113

Let me put this one to rest before I leave for the weekend.

UKC is recommending to each association that they form a committee of their own choosing to review the proposed standard. Yes, the revision is primarily one of re-organization. But as I said above, there were also some clarification issues that we would like to address to make the standards more descriptive. We are not trying to get any of the associations to try to change the dog's type. That's why we are asking for association input. As guardians of the breed, they are the experts on their particular breed. Any and all concerns of the associations will be addressed and the standard written to their satisfaction.

I'm going to suggest that each association for a committee to examine the proposals. That committee may take the proposal to the membership for comment. The committee should then filter those comments and create an official response on behalf of the association. Those responses can be officially presented to UKC at Autumn Oaks. Kathy will appreciate meeting with each association at Autumn Oaks face to face to make sure the standard is to their liking. This will in fact be the most efficient process to work through this project.

We are suggesting a completion by Autumn Oaks to give the Assn's time to work on their end and also to allow us enough time to make revisions for the new rulebook. I would suggest that anyone that is interested in this process contact their breed association to make their concerns known. The proposals will not be collectively posted on the website. They are being presented to Association officers so that they may handle it as best seen fit.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 05-12-2006 04:31 PM
Todd K / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Todd K / UKC Click here to Send Todd K / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Todd K / UKC Find more posts by Todd K / UKC Add Todd K / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:08 PM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)