honalieh
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 2161 |
Agreed
quote: Originally posted by yadkintar
I know how you breed dogs just like I do and we hunt what we breed and am pretty sure if hides got high again we would get a good check. That's the point I am trying to make and Jim Meeks article says the same thing. Dogs were trained to tree every coon they got near back then did not even worry about the rules.
Tar
I agree 100%, but I hunted back then when hides were what counted and paid. But, most hunters of today don't have that same experience or background, so can't really relate to it. Different times, different priorities, different objectives. And, contrary to current opinions, there was more money in the game back then. Difference being that we got our checks from the furbuyers.
That said: I think the natural talent level of the average pup of today is greater than the natural talent level of the average pup of yesteryear. The difference is in the demands, expectations, training, guidance, and corrective actions of many of the hunters of today. The trainers that DEMAND ACCURACY, are still getting it!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|