Rocketman55
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: SE Ohio, Glouster
Posts: 2244 |
I too was a master of hounds at our local small club event and had this very issue come up. This was my dilemma; do I tell this young man (relatively new to the sport) and tell him why I cannot accept his scorecard and ask him to go outside and make the necessary change, or do I take the card, follow the rules as they are written (to my understanding) and scratch the man that won the cast and award the cast win to the next available (properly scored and documented) dog in his cast? It easy to say what you would do, without really being put in that situation, BUT it is MUCH harder to actually do it when you know it was a honest mistake. If I favor the first option I face the fact that some folks in that clubhouse will see me as a cheater and not willing to follow/enforce ALL the rules as they are written. If I favor the second option, I run the risk of driving away the very newcomers to this sport that we need to keep our sport alive. Neither option is favorable for me.
That being said, I followed the rules and scratched that dog for failure to fully complete the scorecard. I then contacted my breed rep and voiced my discontent for the way the rule was written and that it took the ability of the Master of hounds to make a minor adjustment that would not affect the actual outcome of the winner of the cast, much like it was when folks failed to accurately document 120 minutes of hunting time on the score card. I asked my breed rep to vote to repeal this rule as I feel it is unintentionally hurting the beginners to this sport.
I have NO IDEA which way my breed rep voted in this past years rules committee meetings as I'm pretty sure I read where the actual vote of any/all breed reps is NOT public information released to the members of UKC. Therefore It is my understanding we have no way of knowing how our current breed reps voted on this particular rule or any other rule that was brought before the committee. We only get made aware of the number of votes for and against a rule proposal, and not how our individual breed reps actually voted.
Would I like to see this rule changed? Absolutely, and the above mentioned situation is exactly why. That being said, we are STUCK for at least another two years before this rule can be reviewed again. For all that get a bad experience from this rule, I apologize, as even though I did my part to make my breed rep know I didn't like this rule, the new proposal never passed the rules committee meeting at last years AO's. Now I encourage EVERYONE on this board that doesn't like the way this rule is written, to contact your breed rep, voice your displeasure of the rule in the way it is written and enforced, and ask for a change!!
Now we are at a disadvantage when we are not able to find out exactly how our breed reps voted, as without knowing that, it is simply luck of the draw if we vote out any particular breed rep and try to replace them with someone who might share similar values as myself/yourself.
Not that this helps much, but as the rule is currently written, Mr Johnson has given you the correct interpretation of this rule we have to work with.
__________________
Phone-740-767-2572
Dave Mayles
11210 Davis Road
Glouster, Ohio 45732
Home To:
Gr.Nt.Ch. Hooper Ridge Hang'em High Holly
Gr.Nt.Ch. Hooper Ridge Rockets Top Gun.
Gr.Nt.Ch.Hooper Ridge Rocket
Gr.Nt.Ch Hooper Ridge Dolly
Nt.Ch Hooper Ridge Queen
Nt.Ch Raw Dawg Rowdy
PR Tree Banging Buddy
HOOPER RIDGE ENGLISH-POUND FOR POUND THEY ARE ONE TOUGH HOUND!!!!
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|