UKC Forums UKC Website :: Hunting Ops :: All-Breed Sports :: Registration :: UKC Online Store
Here you can view your subscribed threads, work with private messages and edit your profile and preferences Registration is free! Calendar Find other members Frequently Asked Questions Search Home  
UKC Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 UKC Forums > Departments > UKC Coonhounds > Scoring question?
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Tim MACHA
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Troy Iowa
Posts: 2159

Last sentence of 11b

However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to hold onto or release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is not declared treed.

__________________
OFFICIAL FIELD TESTER FOR LEMS LIGHTS

Good people do not need laws to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws (Plato)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-13-2016 04:31 AM
Tim MACHA is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Tim MACHA Click here to Send Tim MACHA a Private Message Click Here to Email Tim MACHA Find more posts by Tim MACHA Add Tim MACHA to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
rob thompson
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Bois d'Arc, MO.
Posts: 1823

quote:
Originally posted by jimbob_walker
Maybe the difference in this particular situation was the dog out was already struck in.
no the difference was there wasn't a dog treed, if there was it would have kept the 8 off the dog at large and you could have recast.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-13-2016 05:03 AM
rob thompson is offline Click Here to See the Profile for rob thompson Click here to Send rob thompson a Private Message Click Here to Email rob thompson Find more posts by rob thompson Add rob thompson to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
jimbob_walker
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Apr 2010
Location: jamestown,pa
Posts: 612

quote:
Originally posted by rob thompson
no the difference was there wasn't a dog treed, if there was it would have kept the 8 off the dog at large and you could have recast.
OK, that makes sense that the 8 couldn't run on the dog that was still out, but it doesn't make sense that once you score a tree with dogs still out, you have to walk back to the last place they were heard opening then start the 8 with the dogs still on the leash.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-13-2016 01:55 PM
jimbob_walker is offline Click Here to See the Profile for jimbob_walker Click here to Send jimbob_walker a Private Message Click Here to Email jimbob_walker Find more posts by jimbob_walker Add jimbob_walker to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Hoosier Man1
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6868

quote:
Originally posted by jimbob_walker
OK, that makes sense that the 8 couldn't run on the dog that was still out, but it doesn't make sense that once you score a tree with dogs still out, you have to walk back to the last place they were heard opening then start the 8 with the dogs still on the leash.


jimbo your confusing a few different scenarios. Refer back to the original post.

2 dogs treed. 1 dog out running but not struck and 1 dog on the leash. The question was can he re cast his dog?

The answer is yes he can because a dog out running even if it's not struck is to be considered trailing, therefore the dog on the leash has the option to re cast or walk his dog into the 2 treed dogs.

The example your talking about is pulling treed dogs off a tree then walking to the last place the dog or dog(S) were last heard opening and that's where the 8 is to be applied before turning loose.

__________________
Grand Nite Ch PKC CH(3) Main Street Blueberry Jam(Autumn Oaks Final 4 Grand Nite Ch 2015) UKC world finalist 2017 Ohio State Ch 2018
Grand Nite Ch(4) PKC Silver CH Main Street Blue SS quarterfinalist 2018. Autumn Oaks Grand 16 2018. Senior Showdown semifinalists 2020. UKC top 25 World hunt 2020. PKC quarterfinalist 2020
Grand Nite Ch HOF PKC Silver Ch Heatseaker Unleash the Kraken(Grand at 15 months old) BBOA Overall 1st place X2, Tournament of Champions Finalist, National Bluetic Days overall winner, Autumn Oaks Grand 16x2 PKC SS Semi Finalist PKC State Hunt Final 4 UKC World Top 20
GRNT CH BLUES AMAZING GRACE
Trevor Hack
567-231-7413

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-13-2016 05:04 PM
Hoosier Man1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Hoosier Man1 Click here to Send Hoosier Man1 a Private Message Find more posts by Hoosier Man1 Add Hoosier Man1 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Night Shift
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 879

I guess the more I think about it if you have three dogs treed and one out but not stuck you can recut those dogs with out waiting for the dog that hasn't struck to open.

__________________
Jason Smith
Home Of
National GrNtCh GrNt GrCh Dark Side of Skuna River

Gr Nt Ch Maniac's Dark Side of the Moon

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-13-2016 06:34 PM
Night Shift is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Night Shift Click here to Send Night Shift a Private Message Click Here to Email Night Shift Find more posts by Night Shift Add Night Shift to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Hoosier Man1
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Oct 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 6868

quote:
Originally posted by Night Shift
I guess the more I think about it if you have three dogs treed and one out but not stuck you can recut those dogs with out waiting for the dog that hasn't struck to open.


Exactly

__________________
Grand Nite Ch PKC CH(3) Main Street Blueberry Jam(Autumn Oaks Final 4 Grand Nite Ch 2015) UKC world finalist 2017 Ohio State Ch 2018
Grand Nite Ch(4) PKC Silver CH Main Street Blue SS quarterfinalist 2018. Autumn Oaks Grand 16 2018. Senior Showdown semifinalists 2020. UKC top 25 World hunt 2020. PKC quarterfinalist 2020
Grand Nite Ch HOF PKC Silver Ch Heatseaker Unleash the Kraken(Grand at 15 months old) BBOA Overall 1st place X2, Tournament of Champions Finalist, National Bluetic Days overall winner, Autumn Oaks Grand 16x2 PKC SS Semi Finalist PKC State Hunt Final 4 UKC World Top 20
GRNT CH BLUES AMAZING GRACE
Trevor Hack
567-231-7413

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-13-2016 07:04 PM
Hoosier Man1 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Hoosier Man1 Click here to Send Hoosier Man1 a Private Message Find more posts by Hoosier Man1 Add Hoosier Man1 to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Sonny Phipps
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Glenmont,Ohio
Posts: 1188

Re: Re: Scoring question?

quote:
Originally posted by Hoosier Man1
Any dog off the leash is to be considered trailing so A and B have the choice of turning loose or walking into dog C tree.


Where does that come from? Any dog not on leash is considered trailing? I need a better explanation of that.


Here is the catch to it also: if you cut loose before you score the tree, all dogs strike back in for 25. After the tree is scored, strike is open.

My thought would be if the rule rule says "opening" , that's what you have to go by. Not by what was discussed one time and never got changed. JMO

__________________
Get deep or Get Beat!

Last edited by Sonny Phipps on 09-14-2016 at 04:29 PM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-14-2016 04:20 PM
Sonny Phipps is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Sonny Phipps Click here to Send Sonny Phipps a Private Message Click Here to Email Sonny Phipps Find more posts by Sonny Phipps Add Sonny Phipps to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Night Shift
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 879

I would rather have 150 to my self then 225 and the other dog get 150 for backing. I cut loose any chance I get.

__________________
Jason Smith
Home Of
National GrNtCh GrNt GrCh Dark Side of Skuna River

Gr Nt Ch Maniac's Dark Side of the Moon

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-14-2016 04:36 PM
Night Shift is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Night Shift Click here to Send Night Shift a Private Message Click Here to Email Night Shift Find more posts by Night Shift Add Night Shift to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Tim MACHA
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Troy Iowa
Posts: 2159

Re: Re: Re: Scoring question?

quote:
Originally posted by Sonny Phipps
Where does that come from? Any dog not on leash is considered trailing? I need a better explanation of that.


Here is the catch to it also: if you cut loose before you score the tree, all dogs strike back in for 25. After the tree is scored, strike is open.

My thought would be if the rule rule says "opening" , that's what you have to go by. Not by what was discussed one time and never got changed. JMO



If you would think of it as dogs competing rather than opening, I think it would make more sense to you. Any dog not on leash is considered competing.

__________________
OFFICIAL FIELD TESTER FOR LEMS LIGHTS

Good people do not need laws to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws (Plato)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-14-2016 04:58 PM
Tim MACHA is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Tim MACHA Click here to Send Tim MACHA a Private Message Click Here to Email Tim MACHA Find more posts by Tim MACHA Add Tim MACHA to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Allen / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

quote:
Originally posted by jimbob_walker
this question came up in a hunt I was on one night. I had minuses out and stayed out with the cast. 3 dogs left a and b were treed and scored and dog c was out. Judge said no one could cut loose til dog c had opened. The judge was a friend , but I questioned him on it. I told him that didn't seem fair to the dogs on a lead. The next day we both called ukc and we're told you could not cut loose until dog c opened. I believe it was Allen who we had both talked to.


Turning loose without Dog C opening first depends on whether C was declared struck or not. If declared struck, you wait until the C dog opens. If not declared struck, cut 'em without regard to dog C.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-14-2016 08:11 PM
Allen / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Allen / UKC Click here to Send Allen / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Allen / UKC Find more posts by Allen / UKC Add Allen / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
J I Allen
UKC Forum Member

Registered: May 2012
Location: Asheville, North Carolina
Posts: 629

Allen, it seems as though the dogs on the leash are being penalized waiting for dog C to open again when they could be turned loose and if struck break the 8. If held on the leash that allows dog C to tree for 125 because the next bark could be a locate and dog C's handler immediately tree him while the other dogs are standing with the handlers. I feel the dogs should be recast as soon as the handlers have walked from the tree to the point the dogs will not go back to the tree just scored. The name of the game is tree as many coons as you can in 2 hours and wasting 8 minutes for a dog out of pocket to bark is wasting the dogs just treed valuable time, you're not just competing against the people in your cast but hunters in the other cast as well.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-14-2016 10:47 PM
J I Allen is offline Click Here to See the Profile for J I Allen Click here to Send J I Allen a Private Message Find more posts by J I Allen Add J I Allen to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Rip
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927

Re: Re: Re: Scoring question?

quote:
Originally posted by Sonny Phipps
Where does that come from? Any dog not on leash is considered trailing? I need a better explanation of that.


Here is the catch to it also: if you cut loose before you score the tree, all dogs strike back in for 25. After the tree is scored, strike is open.

My thought would be if the rule rule says "opening" , that's what you have to go by. Not by what was discussed one time and never got changed. JMO



The problem is that it was OFICIALLY changed. That is the OFFICIAL interpretation of that rule by UKC.

It does't matter that the wording never got changed, they said that's that that sentence meant and that is the end of it.

We don't have to agree with it, but we do have to abide by it.

__________________
Let's go huntin

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 12:12 AM
Rip is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Rip Click here to Send Rip a Private Message Click Here to Email Rip Visit Rip's homepage! Find more posts by Rip Add Rip to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
GA DAWG
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: North GA
Posts: 14388

So don't really matter if D is struck or not struck. One is treed you cut em loose if you want to.

__________________
Michael Ghorley

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 12:37 AM
GA DAWG is offline Click Here to See the Profile for GA DAWG Click here to Send GA DAWG a Private Message Click Here to Email GA DAWG Find more posts by GA DAWG Add GA DAWG to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Sonny Phipps
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Glenmont,Ohio
Posts: 1188

Re: Re: Re: Re: Scoring question?

quote:
Originally posted by Rip
The problem is that it was OFICIALLY changed. That is the OFFICIAL interpretation of that rule by UKC.

It does't matter that the wording never got changed, they said that's that that sentence meant and that is the end of it.

We don't have to agree with it, but we do have to abide by it.



First off I'm in favor of cutting loose when we can, my point is that if it says in black and white on the back of the score (official rules) "opening" , that's what it is. If this rule cost me a major win I would appeal all the way. Even Allan can't change a rule from what's written cause he feels like it.

__________________
Get deep or Get Beat!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 12:40 AM
Sonny Phipps is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Sonny Phipps Click here to Send Sonny Phipps a Private Message Click Here to Email Sonny Phipps Find more posts by Sonny Phipps Add Sonny Phipps to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Allen / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

Sonny, how familiar are you with the section in the rulebook directly above Rule 1?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 04:34 PM
Allen / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Allen / UKC Click here to Send Allen / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Allen / UKC Find more posts by Allen / UKC Add Allen / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Allen / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

In 12 years, I have never based the resolve of an appeal on the premises of "cause I felt like it". Never have and never will.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 04:35 PM
Allen / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Allen / UKC Click here to Send Allen / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Allen / UKC Find more posts by Allen / UKC Add Allen / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Night Shift
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 879

Upon being scored, dog(s) must be turned loose with other dogs that are opening on trail to compete for next available strike points. However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to hold onto or release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is not declared treed. Read the last sentence it says nothing about a dog that has to be open. Sonny your getting confused on what you do when dogs are trailing and when there is a dog treed. Two different situations two different rules.

__________________
Jason Smith
Home Of
National GrNtCh GrNt GrCh Dark Side of Skuna River

Gr Nt Ch Maniac's Dark Side of the Moon

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 04:49 PM
Night Shift is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Night Shift Click here to Send Night Shift a Private Message Click Here to Email Night Shift Find more posts by Night Shift Add Night Shift to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Sonny Phipps
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2007
Location: Glenmont,Ohio
Posts: 1188

Got it. Thanks for all the help of me understanding.

__________________
Get deep or Get Beat!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-15-2016 06:30 PM
Sonny Phipps is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Sonny Phipps Click here to Send Sonny Phipps a Private Message Click Here to Email Sonny Phipps Find more posts by Sonny Phipps Add Sonny Phipps to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Frank M
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Apr 2009
Location: Genesee Co. Michigan
Posts: 439

quote:
Originally posted by Night Shift
Upon being scored, dog(s) must be turned loose with other dogs that are opening on trail to compete for next available strike points. However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to hold onto or release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is not declared treed. Read the last sentence it says nothing about a dog that has to be open. Sonny your getting confused on what you do when dogs are trailing and when there is a dog treed. Two different situations two different rules.



Jason, read the first sentence of your post. It says once scored dog (s) to be turned back into dog (s) OPENING ON TRAIL. In the case of this cast all dogs that had been declared stuck had been declared treed. Yes there was a 4th dog in the cast but that dog had never been struck that means it's not "opening on trail".

__________________
Frank Manning
(810) 347-5292
Home of
GrNtCh GrCh PKC Ch 'PR' Kate N Roys Demon Seed

NtCh FCh CH 'PR' Just A Dog


Just hunting to have some fun.
Use only the Rules UKC has writen not the ones you think should be there!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-16-2016 11:49 AM
Frank M is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Frank M Click here to Send Frank M a Private Message Click Here to Email Frank M Find more posts by Frank M Add Frank M to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
ThatBlueDog
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Sep 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 113

quote:
Originally posted by Frank M
Jason, read the first sentence of your post. It says once scored dog (s) to be turned back into dog (s) OPENING ON TRAIL. In the case of this cast all dogs that had been declared stuck had been declared treed. Yes there was a 4th dog in the cast but that dog had never been struck that means it's not "opening on trail".



Why stop at the first sentence? Read the second one to get your answer. You have the option to recut if dog or dogs are declared treed so long as there is one dog not declared treed.

__________________
The guy who has to brag about his dog has everything to prove. If it ain't blue it ain't true.

Josh Brewster 330-360-8306

CH NITECH 'PR' That Blue Dog Copper'
Missasissy’s Bad Hatchet

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-16-2016 12:29 PM
ThatBlueDog is offline Click Here to See the Profile for ThatBlueDog Click here to Send ThatBlueDog a Private Message Find more posts by ThatBlueDog Add ThatBlueDog to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Night Shift
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jan 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 879

quote:
Originally posted by Frank M
Jason, read the first sentence of your post. It says once scored dog (s) to be turned back into dog (s) OPENING ON TRAIL. In the case of this cast all dogs that had been declared stuck had been declared treed. Yes there was a 4th dog in the cast but that dog had never been struck that means it's not "opening on trail".

The Next sentence says However and then goes on to describe a different situation and mentions nothing about a dog having to be open.

__________________
Jason Smith
Home Of
National GrNtCh GrNt GrCh Dark Side of Skuna River

Gr Nt Ch Maniac's Dark Side of the Moon

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 09-16-2016 03:07 PM
Night Shift is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Night Shift Click here to Send Night Shift a Private Message Click Here to Email Night Shift Find more posts by Night Shift Add Night Shift to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Allen / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

quote:
Originally posted by Rip
Because I distinctly remember this conversation.

The rule does read "opening" but I was told officially here on the board that was an oversight and that really they meant competing for strike.

I didn't agree with it because that's not what the words on the card say and we are still dealing with the english language but I abide by it because it was the official interpretation of the rule.

I am not sure but I think it was Allan that gave us that one during that particular discussion. I was arguing that a dog had to be opening/struck in and I was told I was wrong. I hate being wrong so I remember it LOL.

The wording was supposed to get changed but I see it hasn't.






You're correct, although what you're saying above is the previous sentence as it relates to situations where no dog is declared treed. The problem was the last two words in the next sentence. Regardless, the wording was an oversight on our part and not the way we wanted it to be. It was not supposed to matter whether or not a dog was trailing or not.

That wording in question and as shown in the 2011 rulebook (black cover) read: However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is still out trailing. That word trailing is what caused the problem which suggests that the dog still out would need to be declared struck (trailing).

We did in fact correct it at the next opportunity which was in the 2014 rulebook. This is the red covered book which is currently still in effect. It reads: However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to hold onto or release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is not declared treed.

By saying "not declared treed" we hoped that would resolve the problem and make it obvious that is doesn't matter whether or not the dog that is at large is declared struck or not.

Working on updating the new rulebook for 2017 and wanted to be sure we fixed this, if we hadn't already done so.

Quit scarin' me like that! lol.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-10-2016 08:27 PM
Allen / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Allen / UKC Click here to Send Allen / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Allen / UKC Find more posts by Allen / UKC Add Allen / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Rip
UKC Forum Member

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927

quote:
Originally posted by Allen / UKC
You're correct, although what you're saying above is the previous sentence as it relates to situations where no dog is declared treed. The problem was the last two words in the next sentence. Regardless, the wording was an oversight on our part and not the way we wanted it to be. It was not supposed to matter whether or not a dog was trailing or not.

That wording in question and as shown in the 2011 rulebook (black cover) read: However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is still out trailing. That word trailing is what caused the problem which suggests that the dog still out would need to be declared struck (trailing).

We did in fact correct it at the next opportunity which was in the 2014 rulebook. This is the red covered book which is currently still in effect. It reads: However, if dog(s) are already treed, handlers have the option to hold onto or release dog(s) so long as at least one dog is not declared treed.

By saying "not declared treed" we hoped that would resolve the problem and make it obvious that is doesn't matter whether or not the dog that is at large is declared struck or not.

Working on updating the new rulebook for 2017 and wanted to be sure we fixed this, if we hadn't already done so.

Quit scarin' me like that! lol.



I didn't mean to scare you. I never looked to see if it had been changed or not personally because I didn't need to. I had the ruling and that was all that mattered. Then when this came back up the other day and I just read what was posted here and assumed it was still written that way on the card.

My apologies sir.

__________________
Let's go huntin

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2016 02:09 AM
Rip is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Rip Click here to Send Rip a Private Message Click Here to Email Rip Visit Rip's homepage! Find more posts by Rip Add Rip to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
Allen / UKC
Administrator

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

No apologies necessary, it's all good. It's been a good while ago and was concerned that we did fail to correct it. Thought we had but when this discussion came up, I was second-guessing myself.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Old Post 10-11-2016 02:03 PM
Allen / UKC is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Allen / UKC Click here to Send Allen / UKC a Private Message Click Here to Email Allen / UKC Find more posts by Allen / UKC Add Allen / UKC to your buddy list Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM. Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): « 1 [2]   Last Thread   Next Thread
Show Printable Version | Email this Page | Subscribe to this Thread


Forum Jump:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 
< Contact Us - United Kennel Club >

Copyright 2003-2020, United Kennel Club
Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.3.0
(vBulletin courtesy Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.)