Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Central Pa
Posts: 1114

quote:

---

Originally posted by Richard Lambert
Do you really think that there has ever been a time when a large portion of the population didn't "doubt the governments integrity"? It must have been before the Vietnam War or maybe before the Civil War.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Central Pa
Posts: 1114

And it's on both sides. Bernie Sanders is doing so well because he's constantly preaching about a "rigged" system, and many times he's talking about his own side.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Apr 2015
Location:
Posts: 421

One thing for sure, sanders is honest, to bad he is on the wrong end of it.

__________________
Scott Morris
513-435-0977

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Central Pa
Posts: 1114

quote:

---

Originally posted by ScottCK 6
One thing for sure, sanders is honest, to bad he is on the wrong end of it.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 2760

quote:

---

Originally posted by Well Started
Yep. If I was a democrat, I'd have a hard time not voting for him, given the other choice. He actually believes what he's saying, even though he's wrong on the economics, and he's not corrupt.

---

__________________
ringtail dave

"TREE MY DOG" - NO BETTER FEELING

NAADP Charter Member....... appointed by King Dave himself........

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jun 2003
Location: North GA
Posts: 14395

To bad hes a socialist that wants everybody to get free crap from the working man.

__________________
Michael Ghorley

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Central Pa
Posts: 1114

quote:

---

Originally posted by GA DAWG
To bad hes a socialist that wants everybody to get free crap from the working man.

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jul 2006
Location: Montrose, IL.
Posts: 122

Not trying to take sides, see both Apple's view and don't trust the Government but in the San Bernido murders why can't the F.B.I. give the phone to apple, stay 50 foot away with no camera's, and have apple open this 1 phone, and only this phone. The guy is dead and as far as I am concerned has no rights. and it might show who was helping him. On the other side maybe it is a hoax and he had no help. At least it would be known.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jul 2003
Location: greensburg,ky.
Posts: 3364

jmo but i don't believe hillary should be allowed to run for president of our country if she is under investigation by fbi....

__________________
on fire/tree dogs

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Aug 2005
Location: BROWNSTOWN, IN
Posts: 3519

quote:

---

Originally posted by steve pickett
jmo but i don't believe hillary should be allowed to run for president of our country if she is under investigation by fbi....

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: Chattanooga, Tn
Posts: 22586

I always thought that "innocent until proven guilty" was another one of those American Principals?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Sep 2004
Location: ohio
Posts: 772

I would say apple has it just wants PAID to use it as it would ruin future sales .....and only thing our government pays is foreign countries and American slugs votes.....so Mexican standoff pun intended

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jun 2007
Location: jacksonville, nc
Posts: 2856

Now, as reported by fox, the table has been turned. Apple wants to know how the government opened the phone. I wonder how willing the government will be to let apple know how they did it after the way apple treated the government.

__________________
happiness is: being saved by the grace of GOD! i'm happy and hope you are too!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Coal Country, WV.
Posts: 165

The feds. have this policy of not giving statements for on going investigations. I just wonder if there wasn't some secret back door/out of public sight help from Apple on this?

__________________
Thats the good thang bout possum inners,, theys just as good the second day.
Quote: Jed Clamett

Lafe Crick lies so bad, someone else has to whistle for his dog. Quote: Jed Clampett

I'm feeling lower than a snakes belly in a wagon track. Quote: Jed Clampett

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Mar 2008
Location: Menominee, Nebraska
Posts: 875

I was going to hold my tongue, but I can't help it. For the love of God people read the constitution. Your right to privacy can be infringed upon if there is probably cause to issue a warrant. If this (expletive deleted) was still alive, he would have no legal grounds to deny the FBI from trying to search the phone.

Now if there was a constitutional right being violated, it could be argued that the 3rd amendment is being violated, in that a governmental organization is trying to force a private party to render services out of convenience.

By the way, this whole argument is irrelevant because the FBI paid a third party to crack the phone and they did it without Apple's help.

__________________
Walk softly and carry a big stick.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged