deschmidt27
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Burlington, CT
Posts: 1758 |
I feel compelled to make a couple comments, specific to the last two posts.
First, I need to reiterate that this is much bigger than a TV show. I happen to produce one, and that was part of the context of my original post, but the point I was trying to make was that we all have a part in how our sport is "viewed" by the general public. Everytime we write a post you can impact public opinion. Everytime your hounds cross someone's land, you can impact their opinion... did you apologize for the ruckus you caused, were your dogs skin and bones when they saw them, have you repeatedly been told to stay away, but decided, "screw them, it's a free country"??? What control did you have, and what choices did you make?
Secondly, holy cow did Joe, Shane and I miss the boat on marketting our show. We were on two national television networks, over two years, and many of you have no idea what we're talking about!!! But with that said, we had our flaws and certainly never had the budget to produce what we wanted to produce, but we recevied very little negative feedback. And what we did receive was not from tree-huggers it was from houndsman... you don't shoot enough coon, you shoot too many times at them (I know I'm working on it!) you shoot too many coon, not enough competition hunts, too many competition hunts, too many walkers, not enough you name it, and the list goes on and on.
But I personally never heard anyone say, that we showed the sport in a bad light, or made someone look like a hick. 99% of the time, it was well recevied and appreciated for the positive exposure it did provide. And our future seasons will be no different, but it's only a small step in the right direction.
__________________
David Schmidt
219-614-0654
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|