Joseph A Clark
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Oct 2011
Location:
Posts: 389 |
I think titles neither prove nor disprove a dogs true worth. If a dog obtained a title by legitimate means, then it deffiently means something and has worth. On the flip side of that, if they got a title by cheating, faults being over looked etc it means nothing. I think what everybody is try'n to express is that by a dog having a HTX title on top a NiteCh title etc is that it takes some doubt out of the equation as to whether or not he's a " me to " dog.
I've never understood why in order to obtain a NiteCh title a dog has to have won a first place with competition but yet to make GrNiteCh he doesn't have to have any competition! You can hunt a NiteCh in 5 hunts, with him the only dog in a cast all five times, and as long as he has plus points he earns championship points toward his Gr title. This seems backwards to me.
The problem lies with the people who are not really concerned with how good their dog is actually doing, but rather with the titles. I know a few people myself that seem to be chase'n a title more for bragging rights and self gratification in all the events. Whether it's a nite hunt, bench show, or HTX.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|