Oak Ridge
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6168 |
quote: Originally posted by amazingcursouth
i have hunted north and south over the years and was born and raised in NC. I now live in georgia, south ga at that. land of swamps, big blocks of woods and gators. I have hunted in Va, Ky, In, Oh,SC, Tn, NC and Ga. The biggest difference i have seen is that up north the races didn't seem to last as long before coon climbed. lot had to do with patch hunting and clear woods where dogs forced coon to climb or be caught on ground. In Va, the hunting was good but the hills worked on the dogs and coon population was pretty fair. NC good hunting for the most part. Tn HILLS LOL.
SC good hunting with some thick woods. South ga, coons will flat out run. Takes a good track dog and at times a go yonder to get under a coon type coon dog. Its not a North or south deal, its a coon dog deal. Give a dog time to adjust to the hunting and a real coon dog will tree you coons anywhere. some dogs adjust faster than others. We are coon hunters, lets stop fighting over nothing and enjoy the sport. Im pushing 30 yrs in this game and have enjoyed meeting people hunting some nice dogs and culling plenty of duds. Happy hunting no matter where you from.
Thank you for that explanation, and what I get from that is the biggest difference is really about how far the tracks go before going "up".
I can buy that argument if we were proving the better "track dog". But by and large what I've read on here was "a dog should have to go hunting to find a track". And IF you can find a track in two hours to run, you had the better dog.....that is the question that I have. If all things are equal, and all four dogs go hunting, why is the dog that finds the one track available make that dog better than the rest?
__________________
Joe Newlin
UKC Cur Advocate
Home of Oak Ridge Kennels
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|