Rip
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927 |
There are huge problems with making it tax payer funded, even bigger than the problems we have now.
When it is government funded the best and brightest candidates quit going into the field and we will end up with even more of a shortage of health care workers than there is now. Most of those that do go through after Government involvement would be sub par and not able to make it into the field if it was still competitive, let alone graduate as an RN or MD.
Then as with any government program the rationing of the care would start, like it is in all other countrys that have government healthcare. Canada just had their stuff overturned by their courts saying nobody should be forced to wait in line for needed treatment and they could pay for it if they wanted to. People dyin with colon cancer waitin in line to get scoped. It sure does save money when they die off before they get any treatment.
Then the effective tax rate to pay for that kind of inefficient program would be 50-70% or so. Imagine payin that much in taxes to have your healthcare run like the Department of Motor Vehicles LOL.
Then you have the rationing of "healthcare dollars" which means everyone whether you are paying out of pocket or not. California is already doing that in some hospitals. If you have trouble breathing but you smoke they will withold the breathing treatments even if you want to pay for them out of pocket saying it is a waste of healthcare dollars. This is happening right now and is legal under their state system. They also want to look at everything in a numbers way, if you only have a 10% chance of surviving then they don't even try because even at your own expense because it is a "waste of money" 90% of the time.
That's what government healthcare is, rationing of care and counting beans. It's not medicine, it's cost savings.
The Government has never, will never, and can never make anything better. All they can do is make everything they touch into a nightmare.
On the other hand while the system we have is the best in the World (everyone comes here for treatment if given the choice)it could be much better. The doctors and patients share some of the blame for this mess. Many unneeded tests are run, doctors practice expensive "cover my tail" medicine for fear of lawsuits. Patients want the latest, espensive technology but don't want to pay for it, refuse generics etc. Insurance companys take premiums and refuse to pay benifits.
In my opinion the best thing we could do would be to eliminate the lawyers from the system. That's where most of the expense is, lawsuits, fear of lawsuits, malpractice premiums and un needed tests on the doctors side. Insurance premiums without benifits on the patients side, higher premiums less coverage. Making the patient go through months of treatment likely to be unsucessful before allowing better more expensive options. See the same insurance companys own the doctors and the Patients policies. The insurance companys then invest these premiums and if they make bad investments they just raise the premiums and continue to refuse to pay benifits. This could only be a lawyers idea LOL.
Anyway, go back to a pay for service system like it was 100 years ago. You want the service you pay the doctor, no insurance middle man, no premiums, no insurance denial. The doctor should have to do something intentional to get sued, and then the one suing should have to represent themselves (no more lawyers whispering in their ear that "it's a lottery and they really aren't suing a doctor that did all that was humanly possible they are suing his insurance company, it free money"). That way truly egregous acts would get punnished and the frivolus lawsuits would fall by the wayside without the sheisters pushing and conning people into filing them..
__________________
Let's go huntin
Last edited by Rip on 03-16-2006 at 02:32 AM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|