deschmidt27
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Burlington, CT
Posts: 1758 |
Rip makes a good point... calling something a den or place of refuge or whatever else, requires knowledge of a means to enter that place of refuge or den. But... to say that you "can plainly see no coon is there" is a different story.
I brought it up here before, but we've all been dumb enough to go to those hunts in a pouring down rain storm, and when you look up and get pelted in the eyes with rain drops, it's hard to plainly see anything. And if you can't plainly see a coon, or a hole or anything else, then you can't minus the tree.
And if that's an opportunity to not plainly see that a coon isn't there, there are other such opportunities. And yes, if you circle 6 such trees you should start scratching your head on whether they're legitimate, but where do you draw the line... after the first one, or the second, or the third??? And with that in mind, I agree with Truly, if you can't beat a slick treeing dog, minus or not, then you don't have a dog that can put up plus either!
I also agree with the "Marv Schmucker" approach, and Joe Newlin has used that on me, several times!!!
David Schmidt
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|