Oak Ridge
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 6168 |
quote: Originally posted by Darrell
Well, I'm not being argumentative, as I do not prefer one over the other, but just in Saturday nights PKC hunt in MS, 17 out of 42 casts were won with circle or minus. That's 40%. Tell me another one...
Goes to the regional or geographical difference! Watch that same report during the Spring Classic in central Ohio in a month or so.....story will be the same, the percentage will be different though!
Whole story is that each of those cast winners went home with a portion of the entry fee ($50.00) while the dogs that were scoring 600+, 425+, 350+ and 525+ each went home with $290.00 in winnings, $375.00 in added purse money, and the possibility of up to $450.00 or $460.00 in calcutta money. (calculated on Saturday nights entry only)
The question at hand is which title is "easier" to attain. If you follow the example above, a dog could easily get to PKC Champion on one night's hunting......but...understand that it had to outscore 112 other dogs to get those winnings. With hunt numbers being what they are today, how many dogs are finishing with two first and a second place and only outscoring 15 other dogs in the process? Before you answer that, remember that the winnings in PKC are driven by the number of entries.....so if you go to a four dog hunt, your cast win is worth a lot less that if you go to a larger hunt.
The systems are different, each one having it's own merits. Neither one is perfect, and neither one is "easy".....
p.s. not to start another conversation....but I wonder which casts hunted over buckes, and which ones did not have buckets????? 
__________________
Joe Newlin
UKC Cur Advocate
Home of Oak Ridge Kennels
Last edited by Oak Ridge on 02-23-2005 at 05:12 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|