calblu
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: California
Posts: 999 |
Quote taken from that blog's info on heartworm:
"Data on heartworm incidence rates at the local level reinforces how rare heart worm really is. For example, on the map above, California is coded red-hot with 500 cases. And yet, when a total of 4,350 dogs in 103 Los Angeles County cities coming from 21 participating animal hospitals were tested, only 18 heartworm-positive tests turned up."
When I lived in SoCal (including Los Angeles county) I never gave my dogs heartworm preventive. As the quote above shows, it wasn't a major problem there.
When I moved to NorCal -- whole different story! My dogs went on heartworm prevention year round, starting at 4 months old. When I worked the shot clinics at a couple local vets there, we got heartworm positive dogs every time.
One thing to keep in mind is that there are a lot of dogs not on heartworm prevention who are never brought in for a test because the owners can't afford it. If they can't afford prevention and yearly testing, they probably sure as heck can't afford the standard veterinary treatment for heartworms.
I'm as skeptical as anyone about research coming from companies with a vested interest. The results would probably be quite different and more useful if someone were to go around the country (not in a vet clinic setting) randomly drawing blood from predominantly outdoor dogs and testing it at no cost to the owner. Shelter/rescue data might be more useful too.
__________________
Chawn
Rincon Kennel (formerly Chisum-Trail Kennel)
Don't take life too seriously -- nobody gets out alive!
Last edited by calblu on 08-09-2011 at 05:38 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|