gfults
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Petersburg, Tn. aka Redneck USA
Posts: 1184 |
quote: Originally posted by brogy
This reminds me of a cast I guided last fall. I wasn't hunting, just guiding.
4 dog cast, all dogs struck. 2 dogs ( Dog A & B) load up on a tree along a fencerow about 150 yards in front of the cast. 2 other dogs (Dogs C & D) head deeper along the field.
Dog B pulls off the tree and is clearly opening heading to Dogs C & D. Dog A may have opened off the tree but never left. Handlers A & B both suggest they're dogs left and were minused. Immediately after Dog A goes right back to treeing and is re-treed. It isn't clear if she ever left. She may have barked off the tree, but never left it. Maybe put her feet back on the ground and barked. Again the "canopy" thing.
Dogs C, D, & B were treed much deeper. Dog A was retreed at the original tree. Cast allowed Handler A to handle his dog as the rest of the cast proceeded to score the others. As the handler was attempting to get in and handle Dog A it was obvious there was a lot of debri, brush, vines, & etc making it tough for a dog to actually tree "on the tree".
Cast believed the dog never did move, but it was too late to go back and change it. Both trees had coon.
Another bad break. It happens.
If a judge had minused me for what you just described, they wouldve had to call the National Guard to come get me off of him. If the dog was believed to have barked with his feet off the tree but was still treeing at the original tree, why would anybody have ever agreed to allow themselves to be minused?
__________________
Skin that one pilgrim and I'll bring ya another
Gr.Nt.Ch. PKC Ch. Pa. Junior
Tenn. Black Lexus( Pa. Junior x Hulios Lil Stripper)
PKC Ch. Tenn. Blackjack- R.I.P.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|