gfults
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Petersburg, Tn. aka Redneck USA
Posts: 1184 |
quote: Originally posted by LostHeritageKennel
But it was not obvious at the time the dog B was treed in. Or the judge would have immediately given Dog B 125 and made it known to the cast that he was doing so. Nobody would have even thought to start another five minutes, because it wasn't obvious until they got into or close to the tree. It was not determined that they were split until after the first 5 was up, how much after? That we do not know. If they figured it out before the other 5 would have been up, then tree him for 75, if not, tree him for 125 and minus his tree points and if a coon is seen in Dog B's tree, then minus his strike as well. Was just going off the information that was given. I agree that what you said should have been done. But since they weren't obviously split when Dog B treed in, then it changes things.
It dont matter whether it was obvious or not. The judge should start a new 5 EVERY time to avoid what happened. A 5 should be started when dog A is treed, when dog B is treed and when dog C is treed for the simple reason, " you just dont know". That way if dogs are split, the judge has covered his butt and the dogs were judged and scored correctly and fairly. As a MOH it really blows my mind when I hunt at other clubs how many VERY incompetent judges are being used.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|