Rip
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927 |
Yes, but talking to him doesn't count as the official word if there is another published version. What is the official word is the one that was published in the previous advisor column that Todd had written on the subject. (Alan can change that at any time if he wanted to, it's his position and perrogative to do so, but I think since there is something published that would stay official until the alternate ruling is actually published). Not that Alan would willy nilly change anything anyway, for the most part he has been consistant with Todd, who tried to be consistant witht he ones before him etc, but people are people and sometimes they don't see things the same way and there have been some subtle changes over the years. (Heck it could have even been Tank for that matter, it was several years ago).
I am not saying what he said disagreed with what Todd wrote becasue I honestly can't remember which way he went with it, and Alan has been consistant with supporting previous rulings. I do remember that Todd wrote one about that specific situation, and until another one is published whatever Todd said at that time is what UKC's official stance is.
I just wish I could remember for sure which way he went.
I am betting since you talked with Alan that he went that way or Alan wouldn't have said what he did, which would make the most sense, but I just can't remember for some reason. I have a block LOL.
__________________
Let's go huntin
Last edited by Rip on 03-27-2009 at 02:47 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|