Registered: Mar 2007
Location: indiana
Posts: 580

yep if it fits the breed standerd reg it!!! there are a lot of cross breed hounds reg as so called p/r breed.

__________________
boy's i tell ya how it is. i'am not here to bs you. i'am here to hunt dogs and get you the most for your money.my door is open for anyone to come hunt, spend the night or the weekend i hunt hard and it shows in my dogs 317-494-1098 danny suttles

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Sep 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 540

Well you all would definitley have your way. Its too bad, so many of you are willing to crap on the integrity of your chosen breed.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: bainbridge ny
Posts: 2589

do you realize in most breeds cross breeding was used to better the breed why wouldn't it still work, ukc doesn't single register them untill the breed assoc aproves of the dog in question actuall a single registered dog has to prove it can actually tree a coon before there approved a bit more stringent that a pr hound which all can be registered

__________________
the rooster will crow again.. keep them english and keep them looking up
email minihorse@hotmail.com

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Sep 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 540

No Wayne Im an idiot, I didnt know that. You Guys are completley out of control. Might as well just quit registering dogs right now, if you get your way there wont be any need.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Mar 2005
Location: Medina, Ny
Posts: 276

`be reg as they wont tree and some are cross breeds so why cant we get them reg as that in stead Just asking and I know I am AN IDIOT

__________________
Blue Ridge Kennels
Ernest R Stephens Jr

NiteCh GrCh GrFch GrWch "PR" Red Ridge's Super Shock Z HTX 3
1 NiteCh cast wins in UKC
Ch"PR" Red Ridges Zeeva Daveed out of my Z and female I owned
Long Live The Red Dogz
BlueRidgeKennels@hotmail.com
PKC # 82205
585-303-1001

http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/BlueRidgeKennels/thb5159.jpg

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 2162

Here's a few English that weren't purebred :
(1) Boyd'd Little Joe
(2) Hardtime Speck
(3) Beshears Blue Boy II
(4) Daron's Blue Reb

Black & Tan :
(1) Lawson's Big Hoss

Redbone :
(1) Hunters Timber Chopper

Walker :
(1) Johnson's Banjo

What is a purebred anyway? Is it a line that consistently produces outstanding hounds that open, trail, locate, tree, and handle in a similar and consistent manner (with the meat at the end)? If so, where are these purebreds at? I've not run across them.

Surely, no one is foolish enough to believe that papers define breed purity. Ok, maybe some are that foolish!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Aug 2004
Location: bainbridge ny
Posts: 2589

most purebred animal registries consider 7/8 as pure.
look at the quarter horse registry as good as they are there books are still open to thorobreds and a good one is worth many thosands of dollars and i dont think the buyers are throwing there money away on mutts

__________________
the rooster will crow again.. keep them english and keep them looking up
email minihorse@hotmail.com

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Dec 2003
Location: Central New York State
Posts: 231

I have a nice bred female who is a grandaughter of Backwater Pearl. She is only pkc registered because the guy she came from refused to register her in ukc, despite that her father was a gr. nite and her mother is a nt. ch. in ukc. I am having to go through all the rigaramole of getting her single registered so that I can legimately breed her to ukc dogs. Why should I not get her single registred? She is a fine hound .

__________________
Upstate Hillbilly

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Sep 2008
Location: illinois
Posts: 540

Rich in your case, Im all for it. But Im not for crossing breeds and single reg. them.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Feb 2009
Location: wi
Posts: 165

cross breeding was used to start the different breeds but today I don't think it is neccasary to improve any of the breeds.If you look hard enough in the breed of your choice you will find the traits you are looking for to help improve what you feel your dog is lacking.
If you have two good dogs from different breeds and you breed them you should end up with some good cross breds(around here they are called mutts) that shouldn't be registered in my opinion.Just keep making the crosses and someday maybe you can have a breed named after you (I beleive this is what kemmer did).
If I have a registered walker and I bred it to a registered english and all her pups look like walkers. Now I take a female from the litter and get it single registered. I have her bred to another registered walker and she throws out two pups that look english.Can I single register them as english or walkers when both parents meet walker standards?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged