Ben Crocker
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1668 |
Re: Re: Hunting Question????
quote: Originally posted by Allen / UKC
First, the new rule, 4(k) would not come into play in this situation due to the fact that the dog was not "declared" treed.
I see where there's also been some discussion on time used going to dogs declared treed. In a few cases it even gets a little heated. This might be a good topic to include in a future Advisor article in the magazine. I would have to agree with elvis in that the judge should be in control of the situation. I could copy his response for the most part and publish it as the correct way to handle such a situation when judging. Sorry Ben but as a judge I would never entertain the idea of stopping the cast each time the judge starts towards the dog(s) declared treed. I would, however, give you plenty of opportunity to listen for your dog along the way. Like elvis said, a good judge will know if an individual is trying to hold up the cast and WILL NOT ALLOW IT.
As the rules state, you should try to be at the tree within the five minutes whenever possible. Situations where it might not be possible, or in close proximity thereof, would be when the cast is further then five minutes away. The rule is simply interpreted in that the dog is required to hold the tree for five minutes and not more than that if at all possible. Again, the only time a dog(s) should be declared treed for more than five minutes is in those situations where the dog is more than five minutes away from the cast when it was declared treed. Of course, as a courtesy, the judge should stop along the way to allow Ben to listen for his dog.
Sorry Ben. You opened the door and I couldn't resist. And it was all in good fun.
All of this is in good fun But Allen, all your doing is picking sides here. The rule is not clear, it doesn't say it's a judgement call on how long a handler has to listen for his dog during that 5. And thats why this would never be solved at hunts, cause like someone mentioned earlier. 7 out of 10 MOH would give you a different answer. Most of the MOH around here judge a question word for word on how the rule is wrote. And if your good at presenting your "story" you will win 90% of your questions. Seen it happen numerous times. On a side note, before you all start judging me without knowing me.... I have been in hundreds of cast in my short life and have never once took a question back to the club and only (ONCE) did I go back to the club with a question against me, and yes I won that question. I like stirring the pot via this board, don't be so quick to judge folks... like I said.. its all in good fun.
Allen,
Some rules are black and white, other rules as we all know can be twisted and turrned and have discussions like this one here. It all boils down to what that MOH would read into it. Before I type this I want you to know that I hunt UKC, PKC, and AKC hunts regular. I enjoy all 3 and am thankful for each. On the other hand, I think PKC and AKC have one thing that UKC should look into. Do away with MOH... Hastle to a lot of local clubs getting one person to come and sit around for 5-6 hours for very little pay. Why not just have a hunt director, take entries, draw cards, read the yellow paper before sending hunters out. Make the trip worth his while, let him go hunt..., any question brought back should be handled by a panel. Your more apt to have the question handled proper with four heads working on it rather than one. JMO Happy Holidays to the UKC staff, keep up the good work!
__________________
989-529-8563
Last edited by Ben Crocker on 12-12-2008 at 02:54 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|