Registered: Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS
Posts: 1451

i got a question, will the panel be held accountable by ukc for a wrong call?

__________________
Home of these Hamilton county treeing walkers.
GRCH GRNITECH 'PR' OWEN'S STYLISH NOCTURNAL SHAKER.
And the pup 'pr' Owen's Rock River Ace...

Mike Owen owner/handler. hunting in style (WALKER STYLE)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

I'm sure they wouldn't be. The MOH isn't held accountable for making a wrong ruling. And it's a good thing. Nobody would do it if they had to pay some kind of penalty for making a mistake.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS
Posts: 1451

thanks jim, i guess that's a good point.

__________________
Home of these Hamilton county treeing walkers.
GRCH GRNITECH 'PR' OWEN'S STYLISH NOCTURNAL SHAKER.
And the pup 'pr' Owen's Rock River Ace...

Mike Owen owner/handler. hunting in style (WALKER STYLE)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Mar 2004
Location: Tonasket,Washington
Posts: 923

quote:

---

Originally posted by longshot
In UKC , there has to at least one dog trailing for the new rule to apply, is my understanding of it.. You wont be able to cut loose if the other dog(S) are treed only.

I believe the way it will work is';;When you leave a scored tree with your dog , and one dog is treed , and one dog is still trailing... As soon as the trailing dog opens,, Bam,,, you can cut loose..

To put it another way ,,, after you score your tree and are leading your dog away;;

Senario 1... the other dogs are trailing... There is NO option here , you MUST cut loose..

Senario 2... the other dogs are treed... There is NO Option here , you CANNOT cut at all.....

Senario 3... one dog treed and others trailing.. This is where the new rule applies.. You have the option to cut or not..

Someone can correct me if I am wrong...

---

__________________
Home of Strawberry Mt Kennels
Never underestimate the Power of Hillbilly Mac and Southern Sound
Nt Ch Owens Glassy Mt Skip
Nt Ch Southern Sound Jimbo
Gr Nt Ch Ch Southern Sound Matlock
Gr Nt Ch Strawberry Mt Korn
Pr Strawberry Mt Sadie
The reason I hunt this bloodlines is a quote an old friend gave me,"Your either making dust or your eating it."

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 2057

quote:

---

Originally posted by Travis Stirek
Longshot,Allen explained UKC's policy on this one in a different post.Another dog does NOT have to be struck or opening.They just have to be out competing for strike.

---

__________________
Mark Reavis
Southwest Missouri
Dual Grand Champion Super Sambo

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Dec 2005
Location: buckhannon, wv
Posts: 1534

quote:

---

Originally posted by JiM
6 minute thing??????

---

__________________
Southern Kennels
owner: Sam Blosser
Cedarville, WV
home phone:304-462-7054
Cell phone:304-613-9740
dixie_coonhunter_911@yahoo.com
______________________________
Home of:
GRFCH GRNITECH GRCH PR CAL'S TIMBER TRAVELLER

PR Tristan's JR (Tristans Dog)

PR Grampa's Miss Ruby (Ruby's Dog)

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Sep 2006
Location: Greenfield, IN
Posts: 53

In regards to rule 3d d)

"Dog cannot receive plus or minus strike points if he is not on trail when first dog is declared treed unless he trees on separate tree."

A is treed and 5 is up.

B is struck after A is treed with a line under it.

B is treed for 125 (due to new rule change) before cast arives at dog A's tree.

B is at A's tree when cast arives.

B is minused his tree points for not being on his own tree.

Does B now become liable for his strike points since B was "treed" on a "separate" tree from A?

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 2057

Virgil , this is what the new rule says.;

If they are at tree shut out on when judge arrives, strike points are deleted. For all other situations they are accountable for their strike points.}

So strike would be deleted and tree would be minused 125 because the only call possible would have been a split tree for 125 because the first tree was closed... In the past the dog could trail around and quit or the 8 catch them and still not get minused, but with the new rule , they are minused on strike unless on the same tree shut out on.

Bottom line is,, dont call your dog treed after the 5 is up on a tree , unless you know for sure that is split because if he is not split , it is an automatic minus , reguardless if coon is seen, circle or whatever because he was shut out on that tree.

__________________
Mark Reavis
Southwest Missouri
Dual Grand Champion Super Sambo

Last edited by longshot on 11-10-2008 at 01:38 AM

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jul 2008
Location: In the flat land
Posts: 154

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rolin Blues
I don't believe that is going to work at some hunts because they can't make a decision on any question that comes in until people get back for him to form a panel. Example: Cast comes back with a question about a dog being scratched 30 minutes into the hunt. Even with a 3 to 1 cast vote that the dog should be scratched, a Hunt Director can't make the final decision and go with the cast vote so they can finish their hunt until a panel is formed. Now with a 2a.m. deadline, not enough qualified to be on a panel until 1a.m. come back to make the decision. Unless the deadline is extended or everyone just quits, there is no way their hunt can gets finished to make the original deadline. My idea of the Master of Hounds sitting at a club house to make a decision, so the cast can get back to the woods. Now a Hunt Director won't be able to do that. Just my opinion, but I've been playing this game since 1970 and I want the decision to be made as soon as I get back to the clubhouse, so we can go finish a cast, not an hour or two later. I also dis-agree with the turn loose rule, but that's a whole 'new can of worms' and will cause problems, in my opinion. Take care, Ron.

---

__________________

Home of 2 coon tree-ers
Habits Bad Son
CherryPoppins

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Nov 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 9282

quote:

---

Originally posted by longshot
Travis, that is true , but it has always been that way.In the past you could always re-cast after scoreing a tree as long as no dog was treed somewhere else..

I suppose what you are saying is ,,, I just scored my tree ,,, and another dog is treed , but the others are not struck in and are hunting somewhere... Even then I can cut loose???? Correct??

The wording in the rule says '' if another dog is trailing , you can cut '' .... I suppose it should have said '' if another dog is still out , you can cut ''

Someone clarify????

---

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Southwest Missouri
Posts: 2057

Thanks much Allen for the answers.

__________________
Mark Reavis
Southwest Missouri
Dual Grand Champion Super Sambo

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Feb 2008
Location: Southern Virginia
Posts: 374

I like the new rules especially the hunt panel.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Jun 2004
Location: Chatsworth, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 531

now UKC just has to bring in a fee for putting a question on the card. This would stop alot of unnecessary questions!!!!

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged

Registered: Not Yet
Location:
Posts: N/A

Well there is a fee for a question brought to a panel, $20.00. Question for the MOH are still free.

Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged