CooperCreek
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2004
Location: NE/MO
Posts: 579 |
So the government should not give them money so they can't take those loans nor afford to pay for their land and lose the farm all together. As soon as they lose the farm, some big corporate entity can buy it up, along with all the other locals, and start a mega farm operation in the region. See what happens then....wait, just look at the price of gas.
I'm not sure where you get that the government steps in and saves the farmers all the time. If so, looks like there wouldn't be so many farmers getting out. Looks like farms kids would be eager to return to the farm to have their life of ease. I was a farm kid...I LEFT! Do you have a clue as to how farm subsidies are calculated? I don't mean a guess, or "i think so", I mean, before you run your mouth, do you KNOW how they are figured. There are no free checks given out, and there are no "because you lost money" check mailed.
I agree with you that they need to stop having both crop insurance and disaster relief. Its either one of the other, no double dipping. I believe crop insurance is the way to go, BUT it will ALWAYS have to be subsidized by the government. Crop insurance breaks all the laws of insurance. Its not a confined incident like a car wreck (instead its widespread, drought affects an entire region, not just one field), and its not random like a house fire (instead its very predicatble, not hard to guess which parts of the country could get drought or where it will flood or hail). Thus, the government has to be a partial underwriter to get insurance companies to insure such a thing.
Last edited by CooperCreek on 04-25-2008 at 12:38 PM
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|