T.Beyer
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Crystal Michigan
Posts: 4483 |
quote: Originally posted by kidsndogs
Number two definitely. His backline is smooth, whereas #1 is a bit swaybacked. His shoulder angulation is nicer also-look at the chest and how much is in front of the leg. #1 is very straight-he won't have good reach and will have a hard time keeping up.
#2 has a better neck/shoulder assembly-how and where the neck attaches. It is smooth and #1 is a little ewe-necked. 2 looks a bit meatier also-I don't like a refined hound, and DEFINITELY not in my males!
That being said-pup 1 looked straighter in the feet than 2-it could be wiggly puppy syndrome, but if they naturally stack like that then 2 looks a little cowhocked.
Keep in mind that since these are pics, it could be your fault! LOL Without seeing them in person, or seeing them move, it is hard to say. Movement tells a lot about how they are put together.
Also take temperament into consideration-a well built dog with no drive will lose to a mismatched dog with loads of work ethic every time. I know, I have a B&T here that looks like an old nag, but beats the dogs to the tree every time.
They are definitely both adorable-and I am sure will make fine coondogs.....I hope I don't offend anyone with these remarks-after all, I could be blowing smoke!
And they are just puppies not fully developed yet. 
Hard to determine all of that staying true when the pup is a year old. It could all stay the same, or it could not. Coondogs are for hunting and showing is just icing on the cake anyways in my opinion.
__________________
Rip Acorn Creek Black Swamp Jester
In Honor of Jim Sizemore, " This ain't no benchshow!"
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|