honalieh
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 2162 |
Quality of Dogs?
Overall, I think the POTENTIAL of dogs is probably as good now as it's ever been.
Quality is the result of potential and the development of that potential (hunting, training, handling, correction). The OVERALL quality of training has probably slipped significantly over the years.
If you are talking about the overall quality of Nite Ch.'s and Gr. Nite Ch.'s, you've got to consider the # and the size of the hunts today, as well as the objectives of the hunters. A lot more hunts, and a lot smaller entries = a lot more Nite Ch.'s and Gr. Nite Ch.'s. So, obviously, you'll see a lot more Nite and Grand Nite Ch.'s that aren't top dogs.
If championship points were based on entries (win a 40 dog hunt-get 40 points, win a 4 dog hunt, get 4 points-still have to get 100 points), you'd see a steady increase in the quality of titled dogs. But, with participation as low as it is already, this could kill the local clubs.
It still comes down to : the best and most knowledgable hunters/trainers will have the best dogs. The best, and most conscientious breeders, will hunt with what they are breeding to!
It's the people that try to take shortcuts (breeding/buying based on titles or title %'s) that have the biggest problems and complaints.
If you looked at a pup as an investment into your next 10-15 years of hunting, you'd be more particular in what you bred to or bought a pup from (regardless of titles/PAD's/promotion). You can talk and brag about those things, but, see how far that carries you when you're hunting that dog on a cold and frosty night (or a hot dry night).
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|