Well Started
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jan 2016
Location: Central Pa
Posts: 1114 |
quote: Originally posted by T Felderman
I prefer non hunting judges at that point but would like to see a rule majority of the cast must see the coon or the judge and 2 cast members.
Kinda what I was thinking as a way to resolve future disputes. Majority rules. If a non hunting judge and the handler of a dog in question see the coon, surely at least 1 of the 3 remaining handlers would be honest enough to admit seeing it if it's there. Hopefully all of them. If it's not there, then 3 cast members would over ride a bad judge.
I'm saying this purely hypothetical. It would be unfair of me to publicly accuse the cast in question without more information. Majority rules wouldn't be fool proof either, but unless the majority of people are more dishonest than I think, it would have to be better than giving total power to a single person in every cast and expecting all those single people to always be 100% when stakes are high.
My opinion, but just thinking out loud. It doesn't mean much.
__________________
Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured… but not everyone must prove they are a citizen. Now add this: Many of those who refuse, or are unable, to prove they are citizens will receive free insurance paid for by those who are forced to buy insurance because they are citizens.
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|