deschmidt27
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Burlington, CT
Posts: 1758 |
Those Maintaining "old blood"
Are there any people on this thread, that are purely maintaining the old bloodlines, without any recent out-crosses? I'm talking about a pedigree where the average 20 year old, wouldn't recognize any of the names! No Sackett Jr, nothing with "Attack" in the name, no Mojo, no version of "X", no Trackman, not even Clover. A kennel full of line bred dogs, with a bunch of "no-names" in the pedigree until you find a Lipper, Harry, or even Chief!
I'm assuming this will likely be a "pleasure hunter" or maybe a competition hunter with a whole lot of discipline! Someone who chose to never out cross to the latest fad.
I'm asking this question to test a few theories...
1. I'm assuming that these types are rarely on this type a forum, because they're more "old school", and there's nothing wrong with that! Also, the types on this kind of forum are usually looking for new technology, new ideas, etc. and the type of person I have in mind relies more on the time-tested ideas and theories.
2. If this line exists, they probably make way less trees than some of us are accustomed to, but with more coon in them. And their hounds are more likely to be ball mouth tree dogs, or a combination tree dog, as opposed to rattling off 120 barks a minute, at potentially a slick tree!
3. And if this line exists, these dogs are probably less high strung, and hunt much closer, but again more likely to have a coon 50 feet from the truck, than a slick a 1/2 mile away.
4. If the last two theories, lead you to beleive that I think the old dogs were much better coon dogs than the current dogs, well... in some regards yes, but those old dogs had many weaknesses too. However, there are a lot of generations since those old dogs, and I assume these hunters have bred out some of those old weaknesses, but without breeding in the weaknesses of some of the more recent "flavors of the week".
Does such a person and program exist? Or is theory one correct, and they might, but there not on here to respond???
David Schmidt
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|