MARSHALL AYERS
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Mar 2011
Location: candler nc
Posts: 1404 |
quote: Originally posted by JiM
Why would you want to eliminate RQE's and the Zones?
At a time when UKC is losing hunters in droves, it probably ain't just the best idea to turn it into something completely unrecognizable from what it has been for more than a half century.
ACHA, the guys that use to host the biggest, best and most respected World Hunt in the coonhunting sport, has done exactly that. Ask them how it is working out for those guys.
Or NASCAR. Lotta great ideas led abandoning it's roots. Straight into a monumental nosedive. Better think REAL hard about these changes.
Eliminate the rqe hunts because because there wouldn’t be a need to goto them for one. People like rqe hunts I get it. But what’s better for the registry, clubs, and sport? a guy hunting one 30$ rqe or a guy hunting eight 20$ hunts? You could keep the zones to break it down to the top 100 but I feel like that would be unnecessary as well considering there probably wouldn’t be 200 dogs out of the 750 that goto the zones that would win 8 casts a year. I know changing things and going away from the roots has been the demise of some other sports but look at things as a whole, UKC has been in decline for 5+ years and the only way to fix it should start at the local level. With the addition of double headers in 2019 clubs can now hold 12 hunts but if holding 12 hunts only draw 4-6 dogs a hunt there has to be something more enticing to draw hunters. Changing the format for the world hunt would drive hunters to the local level more often than a rqe ever will.
Having 2 extra hunters show up to 6 local hunts across the country all year long is better than holding one rqe with 15-25 dogs in different areas.
__________________
<BIGTIME KENNELS>
MARSHALL AYERS:
828-280-6769
DUAL GRAND GRNITECH'GRCH'PR'NITRO'S BIGTIME GOMER
http://i1178.photobucket.com/albums/x374/bigtimekennels/th_null_zpsaf6e7c86.png
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|