RedScorpion
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Aug 2011
Location: Northern Tier
Posts: 200 |
I asked the question of the definition of a natural on the other thread and got some real good answers. I think we all trained a bunch of dogs in our lives and I think we would all agree that there are very few naturals that start with all of the facets of being a top hound already shown the minute the dog starts. I have noticed some will tree naturally, some will track naturally, some will go hunting naturally, and some have a combination of a little of each. Few are born that have it all, naturally. I have had some of each that blew up, too. Not from hard hunting, but from a natural trait to blow up (imo). If I had my choice, I would take a hard hunting dog that trees if I couldn't have a naturally balanced hound. The rest can be developed (except big mouth, etc.). My best hound wasn't a complete natural but did have one trait, and that it was continuous, steady improvement. He didn't start until 15 months old but it's easy to hunt dogs like that when they keep getting better each night. I don't think I answered any of your questions Richard, but that's all I got.
__________________
Home of the Red Solo Cup
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|