bamablues
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jan 2005
Location: Alabama
Posts: 456 |
my views on paws
I have recently looked up and read a little on this PAWS Bill, i have wrote a letter to the Senate Committe, what do ya'll think?
Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry
Room SR-328A
Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC. 20510-6000
Hello, my name is......... I am a dedicated dog hunter of many breeds. I would just like to state my opinions as honestly as I can. I have raised dogs since the last 10 years. My father has raised dogs all of his life, and so on and so on. I mostly hunt raccoons with my hound dogs and sometimes squirrels. I know many people do not like the idea of hunting what so ever, but it is something where I can meet old friends and enjoy what I like to do. With out puppies there wouldn’t be any dogs. With out good breeding there wouldn’t be any good dogs. Maybe you get the picture. Dedicated breeders in the dog registries across the United States, strive to make that almost perfect litter to make an outstanding dog or dogs. A typical large dog can throw ten puppies with out any problem, if not more. If a breeder can only have at least twenty-five puppies a year, than most definitely will our great sports go down, but our breeds will begin to spoil down also. To back my statement there will be a smaller percentage of puppies that will make a dog. Meaning when I say ‘a dog’, I mean a dog that should stand up to the criteria of that dog’s breed and standards. I can see where you want to eliminate some of the strays, or mutts, but saying a person owns his own kennel he is not breeding mutts, or strays. He is breeding the likes of his dog’s breed to better the breed of which his dog is in. I definitely oppose the acting of inspections on my kennel or anyone else’s for that matter. In order for a kennel to run properly it should be ran by a proper breeder. Inspections of fellow breeders kennels for no reason will only upset the breeder and that is another case in which dog breeds will reduce. I can say that I agree with inspections of kennels or breeders that have had complaints brought against them, but it is against our civil liberties to have the government interfere with our personal dwellings, or pets. If this bill is passed it will greatly defect our larger breed of dogs. I think people who are in favor of this bill should look at this as the effects of the long run, not the short run. I would like to ask the Senate Committee and all others to look at this bill in a bigger picture, and see how it affects the dog’s owner, dog’s club, and dog’s registry, must less all of the requirements of that dog’s needs. It would truly hurt our breeding, and our economy. Our vets would not have as much business, our club’s wouldn’t have as many members, and our registries would not register as many dogs, showing a great decline in money spent to better the breed of a dog. I would like everyone to look more clearly in this PAWS bill, rather than just pass without looking through it, through and through.
Thank you,
Dedicated Breeder and Owner
I know it may seem it came from the woods but is all my own opinions and best I could do. If I need to change something let me know otherwise that is how I oppose this Bill.
__________________
Home of 2011 Alabama State Champion and 2015 UKC Triple Crown Runner up. GRNITE CH Split Treeing Abby and 2015 Alabama State CH, 2016 Alabama Hall Of Fame CH GRNITE CH Indian Creek Copper Top (Top Gun)
"It's not the will to win that matters - everyone has that. It's the will to prepare to win that matters."
-Paul 'Bear' Bryant
'Oakmulgee Creek Kennels'
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|