Rip
UKC Forum Member
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Morrison TN
Posts: 4927 |
quote: Originally posted by JiM
First tell me did the handler call that 4th dog treed or didn't he? It just says " 4th dog is treed and at the same place when cast arrives". So I need to know was the dog DECLARED TREED by his handler or was he just found there treeing when the cast arrives? That makes all the difference on how to score this one.
If the handler treed his dog after the tree was closed and he is with the dogs when the judge arrives, he is minused 125 under rule 4(k).
If the 4th dog was not declared treed, his strike points are plussed if the coon is seen and strike circled if the hole is circled. Rule 5(a).
Like I said Jim, your rules are correct, your application is correct, the dog isn't being minused for being at the hole, it's being minused for not being split which is what the rules say you are doing now if you declare a dog treed after the five.
However, given that it is a new rule, and that UKC has a complete different set of rules for holes and trees, and the precident that has been set in the past, this being a new rule it is one that has the chance of being in the category of "whoah, that's not the intent of the rule" things. Especially since dogs in the ground can sound like they are split three ways till Sunday. I can't count the times people have tried to split tree dogs under the old rules with them in the ground LOL.
Remember we went through this with the stationary rule, they clarified that the dog could only be scratched if it was treed at a tree not a hole because dogs don't always tree the same at a hole, may leave etc.
That could happen here as well due to the sound effects from being in the ground and it not being a tree etc. It may not, it's their ball they can do what they want with it, but just sayin not to forget that is a real possibility here.
__________________
Let's go huntin
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|